Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Mar;31(3 Suppl 1):I2-9.
doi: 10.1002/clc.20362.

Antiplatelet strategies: evaluating their current role in the setting of acute coronary syndromes

Affiliations
Review

Antiplatelet strategies: evaluating their current role in the setting of acute coronary syndromes

Eugene Braunwald et al. Clin Cardiol. 2008 Mar.

Erratum in

  • Clin Cardiol. 2009 Feb;32(2):111

Abstract

Numerous clinical trials have established the value of antiplatelet therapies for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Aspirin (ASA), thienopyridines (i.e., clopidogrel and ticlopidine) and GP IIb/IIIa antagonists comprise the major classes of antiplatelet therapies demonstrated to be of benefit in the treatment of ACS and for the prevention of thrombotic complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clopidogrel is beneficial when administered before and after PCI, and is more effective when combined with either ASA or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing post-PCI complications, coronary subacute stent thrombosis, and thrombotic events in general. It is currently unclear whether a higher loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) is better than the standard loading dose (300 mg), how long therapy should continue, and which maintenance dose is optimal. The role of the GP IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS is less clear due to conflicting data from several studies with different patient populations. Currently, it appears that the use of GP IIb/IIIa antagonists might be most beneficial in high-risk ACS patients scheduled to undergo PCI, who demonstrate non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and elevated troponin levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Friday G, Furie K, Greenlund K, for the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee : Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: A report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2007; 115: e69–e171. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, for the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Unstable Angina/Non‐ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction : A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: e1–e157. - PubMed
    1. Quinn MJ, Fitzgerald DJ. Ticlopidine and clopidogrel. Circulation 1999; 100: 1667–1672. - PubMed
    1. CAPRIE Steering Committee : A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348: 1329–1339. - PubMed
    1. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, Tognoni G, et al., for the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Ischemic Events (CURE) Trial Investigators : Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST‐segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494–502. - PubMed

MeSH terms