Defining an evidence-based work environment for nursing in the USA
- PMID: 18482126
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02148.x
Defining an evidence-based work environment for nursing in the USA
Abstract
Aims: To describe and compare staff nurses' perceptions of their real and ideal work environment in a tertiary paediatric facility; to provide administrators with research evidence for identifying areas for improvement.
Background: The workforce shortage of hospital nurses is a global problem having an impact on the financial resources and efficient operations of an organisation and the quality of care delivered to patients. A direct relationship exists between job satisfaction, retention, turnover and elements of the nurses' work environment. Research identifying specific elements of the current work setting that are in conflict with nurses' views of their preferred practice milieu can help define an evidence-based work environment for nursing.
Design and methods: Using a descriptive survey design, a convenience sample of 385 nurses on five inpatient units and the float team completed two forms (real and ideal) of the work environment scale. The work environment scale consists of 10 subscales within three dimensions: relationship, personal growth and system maintenance and change.
Results: A consistent pattern was seen across all units with reported high levels of involvement, peer cohesion, task orientation and managerial control. Scores for work pressure and autonomy were moderate-high and physical comfort, supervisor support, clarity and innovation were moderate. Overall, highest scores were reported for involvement and lowest for physical comfort. Significant differences were found between real and ideal subscale scores suggesting that staff were able to identify areas for improvement.
Conclusions: Despite moderate work pressure, staff affirmed a highly positive work environment on their units. Specific areas in their current work setting that were not congruent with their preferred work environment were identified and targeted for change.
Relevance to clinical practice: Understanding dimensions of the nurses' work environment needing improvement and involving staff in making and evaluating change supports an evidence-based environment to attract and retain qualified staff.
Similar articles
-
Nurses' satisfaction with their work environment and the outcomes of clinical nursing supervision on nurses' experiences of well-being -- a Norwegian study.J Nurs Manag. 2005 May;13(3):221-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00527.x. J Nurs Manag. 2005. PMID: 15819834
-
Nurses' perceptions of their work environment.J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):337-42. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290415.50263.e6. J Nurs Care Qual. 2007. PMID: 17873731
-
Work environment and workforce problems: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey of hospital nurses in Belgium.Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Aug;43(6):745-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.008. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006. PMID: 16321387
-
Confirmation of a healthy work environment.Crit Care Nurse. 2008 Apr;28(2):56-63; quiz 64. Crit Care Nurse. 2008. PMID: 18378728 Review. No abstract available.
-
How healthcare work environments influence nurse retention.Holist Nurs Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):303-7. doi: 10.1097/01.HNP.0000298615.25222.de. Holist Nurs Pract. 2007. PMID: 17978634 Review.
Cited by
-
Stabilizing and destabilizing forces in the nursing work environment: a qualitative study on turnover intention.Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Oct;48(10):1290-301. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 5. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011. PMID: 21470611 Free PMC article.
-
Positive Nursing Practice Environment: A Concept Analysis.Nurs Rep. 2024 Oct 17;14(4):3052-3068. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14040222. Nurs Rep. 2024. PMID: 39449459 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources