Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2008 May 15;14(10):3060-9.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0126.

Pilot study of vaccination with recombinant CEA-MUC-1-TRICOM poxviral-based vaccines in patients with metastatic carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pilot study of vaccination with recombinant CEA-MUC-1-TRICOM poxviral-based vaccines in patients with metastatic carcinoma

James L Gulley et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Poxviral vectors have a proven safety record and can be used to incorporate multiple transgenes. Prior clinical trials with poxviral vaccines have shown that immunologic tolerance to self-antigens can be broken. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and MUC-1 are overexpressed in a substantial proportion of common solid carcinomas. The primary end point of this study was vaccine safety, with immunologic and clinical responses as secondary end points.

Experimental design: We report here a pilot study of 25 patients treated with a poxviral vaccine regimen consisting of the genes for CEA and MUC-1, along with a triad of costimulatory molecules (TRICOM; composed of B7.1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1, and lymphocyte function-associated antigen 3) engineered into vaccinia (PANVAC-V) as a prime vaccination and into fowlpox (PANVAC-F) as a booster vaccination.

Results: The vaccine was well tolerated. Apart from injection-site reaction, no grade > or =2 toxicity was seen in more than 2% of the cycles. Immune responses to MUC-1 and/or CEA were seen following vaccination in 9 of 16 patients tested. A patient with clear cell ovarian cancer and symptomatic ascites had a durable (18-month) clinical response radiographically and biochemically, and one breast cancer patient had a confirmed decrease of >20% in the size of large liver metastasis.

Conclusions: This vaccine strategy seems to be safe, is associated with both CD8 and CD4 immune responses, and has shown evidence of clinical activity. Further trials with this agent, either alone or in combination with immunopotentiating and other therapeutic agents, are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Identification of CEA-specific T cells in patients pre- and postvaccination by ELISPOT assay, CEA-MHC-tetramer binding, and intracellular cytokine (ICC) analysis. Effectors were used at IVS-2 (see Patients and Methods). Results are expressed as frequency of IFN-γ-producing cells (ELISPOT assay), % of tetramer binding cells (tetramer binding assay), or % intracellular IFN-γ-positive cells (ICC staining assay), respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serum CA-125 levels from a 42-year-old patient (# 22) with platinum-refractory clear cell ovarian cancer who received PANVAC-V on day 1, followed by multiple boosts with PANVAC-F (vaccinations designated by arrows). The CA-125 level decreased from a peak of 351 U/mL to less than 10 U/mL out to 18 months on study.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative sections (A and B) from a CT scan on baseline and day 71 after initiation of vaccination for patient 22 (ovarian cancer). Baseline study reveals ascites (arrows) and mesenteric stranding, both of which are absent at day 71 and all subsequent restagings.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative sections (A and B) from a CT scan on baseline and day 71 after initiation of vaccination for patient 22 (ovarian cancer). Baseline study reveals ascites (arrows) and mesenteric stranding, both of which are absent at day 71 and all subsequent restagings.

References

    1. Ramanathan RK, Lee KM, McKolanis J, et al. Phase I study of a MUC1 vaccine composed of different doses of MUC1 peptide with SB-AS2 adjuvant in resected and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005;54:254–64. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wierecky J, Mueller M, Brossart P. Dendritic cell-based cancer immunotherapy targeting MUC-1. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2006;55:63–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pantuck AJ, van Ophoven A, Gitlitz BJ, et al. Phase I trial of antigen-specific gene therapy using a recombinant vaccinia virus encoding MUC-1 and IL-2 in MUC-1-positive patients with advanced prostate cancer. J Immunother. 2004;27:240–53. - PubMed
    1. Marshall JL, Hoyer RJ, Toomey MA, et al. Phase I study in advanced cancer patients of a diversified prime-and-boost vaccination protocol using recombinant vaccinia virus and recombinant nonreplicating avipox virus to elicit anti-carcinoembryonic antigen immune responses. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3964–73. - PubMed
    1. Tsang KY, Palena C, Gulley J, Arlen P, Schlom J. A human cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope and its agonist epitope from the nonvariable number of tandem repeat sequence of MUC-1. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:2139–49. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms