[Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system]
- PMID: 18483648
[Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system]
Abstract
Background: Since 1975, the Durie-Salmon staging system (D&S) has been a widely accepted prognostic classification of multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Recently, the new International Staging System (ISS) was developed using only the values of albumin and beta2-microglobulin.
Aim: To compare survival of patients with MM treated in six medical centers in Chile according to the D&S system and the new ISS.
Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of demographic information, clinical features and survival rate of patients treated between 1998 and 2002, and grouped according to both systems.
Results: Information of 81 patients aged 38 to 90 years (43 women) was retrieved. According D&S system 11% were in stage I 12% in stage II and 73% in stage III According to ISS, 34% were in stage I 35% in stage II and 31% in stage III Median of survival of all patients was 32 months. Both staging systems had a prognostic value. However, median survival for the three stages of the ISS system was significantly different (67, 29 and 14 months in stages III and III, respectively, p =0.02). Patients in advanced stages II and III of the ISS, had a higher frequency of anemia, hypercalcemia, renal failure and hypoalbuminemia. In stages II and III of ISS the presence of renal failure was associated with a non significantly different lower survival.
Conclusions: The ISS is a simple and effective grouping method for patients with MM, that predicts survival. The presence of renal insufficiency might identify a subgroup of patients included in stages II and III of ISS with a higher mortality.
Similar articles
-
[Analysis of the international staging system of multiple myeloma and its comparison with the DS and IFM staging system in 122 Chinese patients].Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Apr;29(4):217-21. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2008. PMID: 18843972 Chinese.
-
International staging system for multiple myeloma.J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3412-20. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242. Epub 2005 Apr 4. J Clin Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15809451
-
International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.Neoplasma. 2006;53(4):277-84. Neoplasma. 2006. PMID: 16830053
-
Staging systems and prognostic factors as a guide to therapeutic decisions in multiple myeloma.Semin Hematol. 2009 Apr;46(2):110-7. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2009.02.004. Semin Hematol. 2009. PMID: 19389494 Review.
-
IgD myeloma: clinical characteristics and a new staging system based on analysis of Japanese patients.Cancer Detect Prev. 1995;19(5):426-35. Cancer Detect Prev. 1995. PMID: 7585729 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparative survival analysis using the International Stratification Score (ISS) in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma in the Uruguayan population.Med Pharm Rep. 2021 Jan;94(1):48-52. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1750. Epub 2021 Jan 29. Med Pharm Rep. 2021. PMID: 33629048 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive analysis and establishment of a prognostic model based on non-genetic predictors in multiple myeloma.Cancer Biomark. 2023;38(1):49-59. doi: 10.3233/CBM-220451. Cancer Biomark. 2023. PMID: 37522196 Free PMC article.
-
Phase II trial of high-dose topotecan, melphalan and CY with autologous stem cell support for multiple myeloma.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Apr;46(4):510-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.160. Epub 2010 Jun 28. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011. PMID: 20581887 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Biological research on the occurrence and development of multiple myeloma and its treatment.Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 May;11(5):e850. doi: 10.1002/iid3.850. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023. PMID: 37249283 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical