Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Jun;115(7):886-93.
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01717.x.

Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age

A R A Adegboye  1 , Bl Heitmann
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Accuracy and correlates of maternal recall of birthweight and gestational age

A R A Adegboye et al. BJOG. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of maternal recall of children birthweight (BW) and gestational age (GA), using the Danish Medical Birth Register (DBR) as reference and to examine the reliability of recalled BW and its potential correlates.

Design: Comparison of data from the DBR and the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS).

Setting: Schools in Odense, Denmark.

Population: A total of 1271 and 678 mothers of school children participated with information in the accuracy studies of BW and GA, respectively. The reliability sample of BW was composed of 359 women.

Method: The agreement between the two sources was evaluated by mean differences (MD), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman's plots. The misclassification of the various BW and GA categories were also estimated.

Main outcome measures: Differences between recalled and registered BW and GA.

Results: There was high agreement between recalled and registered BW (MD =-0.2 g; ICC = 0.94) and GA (MD = 0.3 weeks; ICC = 0.76). Only 1.6% of BW would have been misclassified into low, normal or high BW and 16.5% of GA would have been misclassified into preterm, term or post-term based on maternal recall. The logistic regression revealed that the most important variables in the discordance between recalled and registered BW were ethnicity and parity. Maternal recall of BW was highly reliable (MD =-5.5 g; ICC = 0.93), and reliability remained high across subgroups.

Conclusion: Maternal recall of BW and GA seems to be sufficiently accurate for clinical and epidemiological use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Agreement between recalled and registered BW, with 95% limits of agreement, confidence intervals and regression line.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Agreement between recalled and registered GA, with 95% limits of agreement, confidence intervals and regression line.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kramer MS. The epidemiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes: an overview. J Nutr. 2003;133(Suppl 2):1592S–1596S. - PubMed
    1. Oken E, Gillman MW. Fetal origins of obesity. Obes Res. 2003;11:496–506. - PubMed
    1. Catov JM, Newman AB, Kelsey SF, Roberts JM, Sutton-Tyrrell KC, Garcia M, et al. Accuracy and reliability of maternal recall of infant birth weight among older women. Ann Epidemiol. 2006;16:429–31. - PubMed
    1. Lucia VC, Luo Z, Gardiner JC, Paneth N, Breslau N. Reports of birthweight by adolescents and their mothers: comparing accuracy and identifying correlates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20:520–7. - PubMed
    1. O'Sullivan JJ, Pearce MS, Parker L. Parental recall of birth weight: how accurate is it? Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:202–3. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types