Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun 15;75(12):2334-44.
doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.03.019. Epub 2008 Apr 6.

Specificity, affinity and efficacy of iota-conotoxin RXIA, an agonist of voltage-gated sodium channels Na(V)1.2, 1.6 and 1.7

Affiliations

Specificity, affinity and efficacy of iota-conotoxin RXIA, an agonist of voltage-gated sodium channels Na(V)1.2, 1.6 and 1.7

Brian Fiedler et al. Biochem Pharmacol. .

Abstract

The excitotoxic conopeptide iota-RXIA induces repetitive action potentials in frog motor axons and seizures upon intracranial injection into mice. We recently discovered that iota-RXIA shifts the voltage-dependence of activation of voltage-gated sodium channel Na(V)1.6 to a more hyperpolarized level. Here, we performed voltage-clamp experiments to examine its activity against rodent Na(V)1.1 through Na(V)1.7 co-expressed with the beta1 subunit in Xenopus oocytes and Na(V)1.8 in dissociated mouse DRG neurons. The order of sensitivity to iota-RXIA was Na(V)1.6 > 1.2 > 1.7, and the remaining subtypes were insensitive. The time course of iota-RXIA-activity on Na(V)1.6 during exposure to different peptide concentrations were well fit by single-exponential curves that provided k(obs). The plot of k(obs)versus [iota-RXIA] was linear, consistent with a bimolecular reaction with a K(d) of approximately 3 microM, close to the steady-state EC(50) of approximately 2 microM. iota-RXIA has an unusual residue, D-Phe, and the analog with an L-Phe instead, iota-RXIA[L-Phe44], had a two-fold lower affinity and two-fold faster off-rate than iota-RXIA on Na(V)1.6 and furthermore was inactive on Na(V)1.2. iota-RXIA induced repetitive action potentials in mouse sciatic nerve with conduction velocities of both A- and C-fibers, consistent with the presence of Na(V)1.6 at nodes of Ranvier as well as in unmyelinated axons. Sixteen peptides homologous to iota-RXIA have been identified from a single species of Conus, so these peptides represent a rich family of novel sodium channel-targeting ligands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A, Four families of peptide conotoxins that target Na channels. Members in the upper two, μ- and μO-conotoxins, inhibit Na channels, whereas those in the lower two, ι- and δ-conotoxins, are agonist. The cysteine framework of each peptide family is illustrated. All cysteines are disulfide-bonded, rendering each peptide into a compact structure. B, The sequence of ι-RXIA, the iota-conotoxin studied in this report, where O is hydroxyproline, and the underlined F (residue 44) is the D-enantiomer of phenylalanine. The synthetic homologue, ι-RXIA[L-Phe44], is identical to ι-RXIA except residue 44 is an L-phenylalanine. The disulfide bridges between Cys residues are indicated. C, Ribbon structure of ι-RXIA determined by NMR spectroscopy [20]. Locations of the Cys residues and their disulfide linkages are indicated; also shown is the side chain of D-Phe44. This figure was prepared using PyMol (http://www.pymol.org).
Figure 2
Figure 2
ι-RXIA modulates the activity of NaV1.6 coexpressed with β1 in Xenopus oocytes by shifting its voltage-dependence of activation. Oocytes were two-electrode clamped at a holding potential of −100 mV, and Vm was stepped in 10 mV increments as described in Methods. Representative current records for voltage steps ranging from −60 to 10 mV in the absence (A) and presence (B) of 10 μM ι-RXIA. C, Normalized current traces from A and B in response to the voltage step to −30 mV (left) and −20 mV (right), in the absence (dots) and presence (solid line) of 10 μM ι-RXIA; each pair of responses to a given voltage step largely overlap. Insets show corresponding traces non-normalized. Voltage sensitivity of activation (D) and inactivation (E) obtained in the absence (open circles) and presence (closed circles) of ι-RXIA. The solid lines are best-fit curves to the Boltzmann equation. V1/2 values for activation in D were −22.38 ± 0.48 (control) and −38.29 ± 0.47 mV (10 μM ι-RXIA) with respective slope factors of −6.08 ± 0.42 and −7.53 ± 0.41 mV. V1/2 values for inactivation in E were −58.71 ± 1.03 (control) and −55.73 ± 0.75 mV (5 μM ι-RXIA) with respective slope factors of 5.98 ± 0.90 and 5.37 ± 0.61 mV. Each data point represents mean ± SE (N = 3 oocytes).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of ι-RXIA on NaV1.1 through NaV1.7 coexpressed with β1 in Xenopus oocytes and TTX-resistant Na channels in dissociated neurons from mouse DRG. Oocytes were used as in Fig. 2, and neurons were whole-cell clamped and TTX-resistant INa were recorded as described in Methods. A, V1/2 of the voltage-dependence of activation in controls (white bars) and in the presence of 10 μM (gray bars) or 50 μM (black bars) ι-RXIA. In 10 μM ι-RXIA, V1/2‘s of only NaV1.2/β1 and 1.6/β1 differed significantly from control. In 50 μM ι-RXIA, V1/2 of NaV1.6/β1 remained unchanged, that of NaV1.2/β1 changed further, and those of NaV1.1/β1, 1.3/β1, 1.4/β1, 1.5/β1, and 1.7/β1 remained insignificantly different from controls. B, Ratio of I′Na/IoNa for Vstep to −30 mV, where I′Na and IoNa are peak INa in 50 μM ι-RXIA and control, respectively. The ratio measurement shows that in addition to NaV1.2/β1 and 1.6/β1, NaV1.7/β1 was also significantly up-modulated by 50 μM ι-RXIA. I′Na/IoNa value of none of the other Na channels differed significantly from 1, indicating they were not affected even at this high toxin concentration. Bars represent mean ± SE (N = 3). *p < .05, compared to bar immediately to its left (A) or compared to value of 1 (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kinetics of the modulation of NaV1.6/β1 by ι-RXIA. Oocytes were used essentially as described in Fig. 2, and the peak INa in response to a Vstep to −30 mV from a holding potential of −100 mV was measured at different times during the exposure to and washout of ι-RXIA. A, Representative time course of INa during exposure to 3 μM ι-RXIA (closed circles) and its subsequent washout (open circles). Absence of points for 5 min in middle of plot reflects period when I-V data were being acquired. Single-exponential best-fits of the data provided kobs (the observed rate constant for the toxin-induced increase in INa) and koff (the rate constant of recovery following washout). Values of kobs and koff for illustrated curves were 0.65 min−1 and 0.24 min−1, respectively. B, Time course of normalized peak INa upon exposure to 0.5, 1, 3, and 10 μM ι-RXIA (from white to progressively darker circles, respectively). C, Time course of normalized peak INa following washout of ι-RXIA (symbols as in B). The data points largely overlap, and the best fit single-exponential curve for all of them is shown, yielding an aggregate koff of 0.227 ± 0.007. D, Plot of kobs (closed circles) and koff (open circles) versus [ι-RXIA], from data shown in B and C, respectively. Values for kobs increased linearly with peptide concentration, best-fit linear regression line (solid curve) has slope of 0.137 ± 0.002 μM−1•min−1 and Y-intercept of 0.394 ± 0.011 min−1. In contrast, koff values remained invariant, with average value of 0.229 ± 0.021 min−1. Each data point represents mean ± S.E. (N = 3 oocytes).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Modulation NaV1.6/β1 and 1.2/β1 as a function of ι-RXIA concentration at steady-state. Current measurements in response to a Vstep to −30 mV were made as in Fig. 4, and modulation is expressed as a ratio of peak currents, I′Na/IoNa, where I′Na and IoNa were obtained in toxin and control solution, respectively. Effect of ι-RXIA on NaV1.6/β1 (circles) and NaV1.2/β1 (diamonds) measured at steady-state, solid line represents data fit to the equation, Y = (Top −1)/(1 + 10^((LogEC50 − Log[ι-RXIA]) × nH)), where nH is the Hill coefficient. Respective EC50 values for NaV1.6/β1 and 1.2/β1 were 1.80 μM (95% CI: 0.93 –3.60 μM) and 17.78 μM (95% CI: 4.70 – 67.21 μM) and nH values were 1.04 ± 0.26 and 1.24 ± 0.44. Each point represents mean ± S.E. (N = 3 oocytes).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of the modulation of NaV1.6/β1 and NaV1.2/β1 by ι-RXIA[L-Phe44] and ι-RXIA. Oocytes were tested essentially as described in Figs. 2, 3, and 4. A, Voltage dependence of activation of NaV1.6/β1 in the absence (open squares) and presence of 50 μM ι-RXIA[L-Phe44] (closed squares); respective V1/2 was −21.66 ± 0. 61 and −25.30 ± 0.27 mV and slope factor was 5.75 ± 0.54 and 5.58 ± 0.23 mV. For comparison, the curve for ι-RXIA from Fig. 2D is shown in gray. B, Plot of kobs vs. concentration of ι-RXIA[L-Phe44] for NaV1.6/β1 (black squares). Slope (or kon) was 0.152 ± 0.008 μM−1•min−1, and Y intercept (or extrapolated koff) was 0.841 ± 0.145 min-1, yielding a Kd of 5.52 μM. For comparison, the curve for ι-RXIA (from Fig. 4D) is shown in gray. C, Modulation of NaV1.6/β1 as a function of ι-RXIA[L-Phe44] concentration (black squares). EC50 was 5.45 μM (95% CI: 2.03 – 14.63 μM) and nH was 1.13 ± 0.39. For comparison, the curve for ι-RXIA (from Fig. 5) is shown in gray; note that at or near saturating [peptide] its efficacy is about twice that of ι-RXIA[L-Phe44]. D, Modulation of NaV1.2/β1 as a function of ι-RXIA[L-Phe44] concentration (black triangles) yields a flat line, showing that the peptide had no effect on NaV1.2/β1. For comparison, the curve for ι-RXIA (from Fig. 5) is shown in gray.
Figure 7
Figure 7
ι-RXIA induces action potentials in A- and C-fibers in mouse sciatic nerve. Extracellular action potentials were recorded simultaneously from two locations along the nerve as described in Methods, 7 mm apart. In each pair of traces, the upper (Channel 1) and lower (Channel 2) traces were recorded from a proximal versus distal location, respectively, relative to the site of electrical stimulus (A) or toxin-application (B). A, Stimulus-evoked compound action potentials (CAPs) in control solution showing fast A-CAP with conduction velocity of 11.8 m/s, and slower C-CAP with conduction velocity in the range of 0.72 to 0.48 m/s. Region of A-CAPs enclosed by (10 ms wide) dashed box is shown in inset with baselines superimposed and reveals a ~ 0.6 ms temporal offset; note 1 ms stimulus artifact near start of traces. B, “Spontaneous” action potentials induced by exposure to 0.05 μM ι-RXIA; representative recordings of single-units with conduction velocities of about 10 (top pair) and 0.7 (bottom pair) m/s. Region of top pair of traces enclosed by (5 ms wide) dashed box is shown in inset, revealing a ~ 0.7 ms temporal offset of this unit corresponding to that of an A-fiber. Lower trace in bottom pair of traces has been shifted leftward by 9.5 ms and reveals near coincidence of units corresponding to those of C-fibers.

References

    1. Gonzalez-Burgos G, Barrionuevo G. Voltage-gated sodium channels shape subthreshold EPSPs in layer 5 pyramidal neurons from rat prefrontal cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2001;86:1671–84. - PubMed
    1. Sontheimer H, Black JA, Waxman SG. Voltage-gated Na+ channels in glia: properties and possible functions. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:325–31. - PubMed
    1. Catterall WA, Goldin AL, Waxman SG. International Union of Pharmacology. XLVII. Nomenclature and structure-function relationships of voltage-gated sodium channels. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57:397–409. - PubMed
    1. Cestele S, Catterall WA. Molecular mechanisms of neurotoxin action on voltage-gated sodium channels. Biochimie. 2000;82:883–92. - PubMed
    1. Norton RS, Olivera BM. Conotoxins down under. Toxicon. 2006;48:780–98. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms