Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature
- PMID: 18486452
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.006
Advancement of the midface, from conventional Le Fort III osteotomy to Le Fort III distraction: review of the literature
Abstract
Since its introduction in about 1950, the Le Fort III (LF III) procedure has become a widely accepted treatment for correction of midface hypoplasia and related functional and esthetic problems. As long-term surgical experience grows and improvements are made in technique, equipment and peri-operative care, the number of LF III procedures performed worldwide is increasing. A number of fundamental questions concerning the technique remain unclear, and large, conclusive studies are lacking owing to the relative rarity of severe midface hypoplasia. This literature review aims to address problems, such as the indication field, timing of surgery, rate of relapse and the use of distraction osteogenesis. An overview of the history and technique of LF III osteotomy and distraction is provided, together with a comprehensive review of the available clinical data.
Similar articles
-
[Surgical correction of craniofacial dysostosis with midface distraction osteogenesis].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007 Aug 1;45(15):1055-7. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007. PMID: 18005589 Chinese.
-
Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis: modification of the intraoral splint in the rigid external distraction.J Craniofac Surg. 2012 May;23(3):856-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbf8e. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 22565908
-
Distraction osteogenesis of the midface: a new implantable distraction device.J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1999;9(4):413-23. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1999. PMID: 10847977
-
Craniosynostosis: Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis.Clin Plast Surg. 2021 Jul;48(3):473-485. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 May 8. Clin Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 34051899 Review.
-
New trends in cranio-orbital and midface distraction for craniofacial dysostosis.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Aug;20(4):298-303. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283543a43. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22894998 Review.
Cited by
-
Management of Midface Deficiency in Syndromic Craniosynostosis with Lefort III Distraction Osteogenesis, Outcomes, and Pitfalls.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Dec;23(6):1355-1365. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02202-8. Epub 2024 May 24. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024. PMID: 39618452
-
Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Orthognathic Surgery: Demystifying Differences in Concepts, Techniques and Outcomes.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01414-y. Epub 2020 Jul 21. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020. PMID: 33071493 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bilateral meningoencephaloceles with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea after facial advancement in the Crouzon syndrome.Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2015 Jan;6(2):138-42. doi: 10.2500/ar.2015.6.0129. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2015. PMID: 26302737 Free PMC article.
-
Crouzon syndrome: Virtual planning of surgical treatment by application of internal distractors.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jan-Jun;6(1):135-40. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.186144. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2016. PMID: 27563623 Free PMC article.
-
The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial syndromes.Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jan;3(1):4-10. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.110063. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23662252 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials