Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory
- PMID: 18487567
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6424
Estrogen- and progesterone-receptor status in ECOG 2197: comparison of immunohistochemistry by local and central laboratories and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction by central laboratory
Erratum in
- J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul 10;26(20):3472. Perez, Edith D [corrected to Perez, Edith A]
Abstract
Purpose: Central and local laboratory concordance for hormone receptor measurement is therapeutically important. This study compares estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) measured by local laboratory immunohistochemistry (IHC), central IHC, and central reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using a proprietary 21-gene assay.
Patients and methods: A case-control sample of 776 breast cancer patients from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study E2197 was evaluated. Central IHC Allred score for ER and PR was obtained using tissue microarrays and 1D5 ER antibody and 636 PR antibody. Quantitative RT-PCR for ER and PR in whole sections was performed using the 21-gene assay.
Results: For ER, the concordance between local and central IHC was 90% (95% CI, 88% to 92%), between local IHC and central RT-PCR was 91% (95% CI, 89% to 93%), and between central IHC and central RT-PCR was 93% (95% CI, 91% to 95%). For PR, the concordance between local IHC and central IHC was 84% (95% CI, 82% to 87%), between local IHC and central RT-PCR was 88% (95% CI, 85% to 90%), and between central IHC and central RT-PCR was 90% (95% CI, 88% to 92%). Although concordance was high, IHC ER-negative cases that were RT-PCR positive were more common than IHC ER-positive cases that were RT-PCR negative. In ER-positive patients, ER expression by central IHC Allred score was marginally associated with recurrence (P = .091), and ER expression by central RT-PCR was significantly associated with recurrence (P = .014). However, recurrence score, which incorporates additional genes/pathways, was a highly significant predictor of recurrence (P < .0001).
Conclusion: There is a high degree of concordance among local IHC, central IHC, and central RT-PCR by the proprietary gene assay for ER and PR status. Although ER expression is marginally associated with relapse in ER-positive patients treated with chemohormonal therapy, recurrence score is a highly significant predictor of recurrence.
Comment in
-
Problems and solutions in the evaluation of hormone receptors in breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2433-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.7800. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18487563 No abstract available.
-
Is immunohistochemistry less sensitive than quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for hormone receptor status determination in breast cancer?J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2733; author reply 2734-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0269. Epub 2009 Apr 20. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19380432 No abstract available.
-
Cancer is heterogeneous.J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2732; author reply 2734-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7646. Epub 2009 Apr 20. J Clin Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19380436 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
