Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production
- PMID: 18488652
- DOI: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.357
Effects of working memory load on lexical-semantic encoding in language production
Abstract
Some models of lexical access in language production postulate that lexical-semantic encoding is driven bottom-up, by the conceptual input, and top-down, by a representation of the task. In the cyclic semantic blocking paradigm, participants repeatedly name sets of objects that are either semantically related or unrelated. Whereas the manipulation of semantic relatedness affects lexical-semantic encoding in a bottom-up fashion, the cyclic presentation of small object sets allows participants to bias the corresponding lexical-semantic representations top-down for selection. The role of working memory (WM) in this top-down modulation was investigated by crossing the cyclic semantic blocking paradigm with a manipulation of WM load. Participants' naming latencies displayed significant effects of semantic context, WM load, and their interaction. A word-naming task using the same materials yielded a main effect of WM load but no significant effects of semantic context or of its interaction with WM load. These and related results are discussed with regard to their implications for models of language production.
Similar articles
-
The Role of Task-Specific Response Strategies in Blocked-Cyclic Naming.Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:1955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01955. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28119637 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cumulative and non-cumulative semantic interference in object naming: evidence from blocked and continuous manipulations of semantic context.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013;66(11):2135-60. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.775318. Epub 2013 Mar 22. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2013. PMID: 23521507 Review.
-
Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm.Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 May;58(4):667-92. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005. PMID: 16104101
-
With or without semantic mediation: retrieval of lexical representations in sign production.J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Apr;20(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu045. Epub 2015 Jan 1. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015. PMID: 25583708 Free PMC article.
-
Strategic origins of early semantic facilitation in the blocked-cyclic naming paradigm.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Oct;43(10):1659-1668. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000399. Epub 2017 Apr 6. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017. PMID: 28383951
Cited by
-
Long-lasting semantic interference effects in object naming are not necessarily conceptually mediated.Front Psychol. 2015 May 7;6:578. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00578. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25999892 Free PMC article.
-
Facilitation and interference in naming: A consequence of the same learning process?Cognition. 2017 Aug;165:61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.012. Epub 2017 May 11. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 28501548 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Task-Specific Response Strategies in Blocked-Cyclic Naming.Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 4;7:1955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01955. eCollection 2016. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 28119637 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lesions to the left lateral prefrontal cortex impair decision threshold adjustment for lexical selection.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb-Mar;34(1-2):1-20. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1282447. Epub 2017 Mar 1. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2017. PMID: 28632042 Free PMC article.
-
Effortful Retrieval Practice Effects in Lexical Access: A Role for Semantic Competition.Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(8):948-963. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2022.2027991. Epub 2022 Jan 28. Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36419750 Free PMC article.