Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada
- PMID: 18489199
- DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826060-00003
Guidelines for conducting pharmaceutical budget impact analyses for submission to public drug plans in Canada
Abstract
Until now, there has been no standardized method of performing and presenting budget impact analyses (BIAs) in Canada. Nevertheless, most drug plan managers have been requiring this economic data to inform drug reimbursement decisions. This paper describes the process used to develop the Canadian BIA Guidelines; describes the Guidelines themselves, including the model template; and compares this guidance with other guidance on BIAs. The intended audience includes those who develop, submit or use BIA models, and drug plan managers who evaluate BIA submissions. The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) initiated the development of the Canadian BIA Guidelines on behalf of the National Prescription Drug Utilisation Information System (NPDUIS). The findings and recommendations from a needs assessment with respect to BIA submissions were reviewed to inform guideline development. In addition, a literature review was performed to identify existing BIA guidance. The detailed guidance was developed on this basis, and with the input of the NPDUIS Advisory Committee, including drug plan managers from multiple provinces in Canada and a representative from the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. A Microsoft Excel-based interactive model template was designed to support BIA model development. Input regarding the guidelines and model template was sought from each NPDUIS Advisory Committee member to ensure compatibility with existing drug plan needs. Decisions were made by consensus through multiple rounds of review and discussion. Finally, BIA guidance in Canadian provinces and other countries were compared on the basis of multiple criteria. The BIA guidelines consist of three major sections: Analytic Framework, Inputs and Data Sources, and Reporting Format. The Analytic Framework section contains a discussion of nine general issues surrounding BIAs (model design, analytic perspective, time horizon, target population, costing, scenarios to be compared, the characterisation of uncertainty, discounting, and validation methods). The Inputs and Data Sources section addresses methods for market size estimation, comparator selection, scenario forecasting and drug price estimation. The Reporting Format section describes methods for BIA reporting. The new Canadian BIA Guidelines represent a significant departure from the limited guidance that was previously available from some of the provinces, because they include specific details of the methods of performing BIAs. The Canadian BIA Guidelines differ from the Principles of Good Research Practice for BIAs developed by the International Society for Pharmacoeconomic and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), which provide more general guidance. The Canadian BIA Guidelines and template build upon existing guidance to address the specific requirements of each of the participating drug plans in Canada. Both have been endorsed by the NPDUIS Steering Committee and the PMPRB for the standardization of BIA submissions.
Similar articles
-
A Comparison of Pharmaceutical Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) Recommendations Amongst the Canadian Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB), Public and Private Payers.Pharmacoecon Open. 2019 Dec;3(4):437-451. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0139-y. Pharmacoecon Open. 2019. PMID: 31041614 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x. Value Health. 2007. PMID: 17888098
-
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13. Value Health. 2014. PMID: 24438712
-
Stakeholders' feedback on the proposed recommendations for updating the patented medicine prices review board (pmprb) budget impact analysis guidelines.J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 3;27(1):e1-e24. doi: 10.15586/jptcp.v27i1.651. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 31922700
-
Proposal of Polish guidelines for conducting financial analysis and their comparison to existing guidance on budget impact in other countries.Value Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;7(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.71257.x. Value Health. 2004. PMID: 14720125
Cited by
-
[Fixed drug combinations in hypertension: a budget impact analysis for the Spanish Health System on the marketing of a fixed combination of olmesartan/amlodipine].Aten Primaria. 2011 Jul;43(7):345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.04.017. Epub 2011 Jan 8. Aten Primaria. 2011. PMID: 21216500 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
The use of pharmacoeconomic evidence to support formulary decision making in Saudi Arabia: Methodological recommendations.Saudi Pharm J. 2012 Jul;20(3):187-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 24. Saudi Pharm J. 2012. PMID: 23960792 Free PMC article.
-
The French National Authority for Health (HAS) Guidelines for Conducting Budget Impact Analyses (BIA).Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):407-417. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0602-5. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29247437 Review.
-
Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An Economic Analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Mar 8;16(8):1-83. eCollection 2016. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016. PMID: 27099644 Free PMC article.
-
Budget impact analysis of breast cancer medications: a systematic review.J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Dec 29;15(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00493-1. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022. PMID: 36581921 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources