Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;143(5):476-81.
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.5.476.

Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience

Affiliations

Implications and management of pancreatic fistulas following pancreaticoduodenectomy: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience

Gregory Veillette et al. Arch Surg. 2008 May.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the management and impact of pancreatic fistulas in a high-volume center.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Tertiary academic center.

Patients: Five hundred eighty-one consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from January 2001 through June 2006.

Main outcome measures: Development of a pancreatic fistula (defined as > 30 mL of amylase-rich fluid from drains on or after postoperative day 7, or discharge with surgical drains in place, regardless of amount); the need for additional interventions or total parenteral nutrition; other morbidity; and mortality.

Results: Seventy-five patients (12.9%) developed a pancreatic fistula. Fistulas were managed with gradual withdrawal of surgical drains. This allowed for patient discharge and eventual closure at a mean of 18 days in 38.7% of cases; these were classified as low-impact fistulas. The remaining 46 patients (61.3%) had an associated abscess, required percutaneous drainage or total parenteral nutrition, or developed bleeding; these were classified as high-impact fistulas and closed a mean of 35 days after surgery. Standard 30-day in-hospital mortality was 1.9% for all pancreaticoduodenectomies and 6.7% for those who developed a pancreatic fistula. The overall fistula-related mortality was 9.3% (7 patients), all but 1 of which was related to major hemorrhage.

Conclusions: More than one-third of pancreatic fistulas are clinically insignificant (low impact). The remaining 60% of fistulas have a high clinical impact and nearly an 8-fold increase in overall mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Duration of low-impact vs high-impact fistulas in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (P < .001).

Comment in

References

    1. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Post-operative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13. - PubMed
    1. Kazanjian KK, Hines OJ, Eibl G, Reber HA. Management of pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy: results in 437 consecutive patients. Arch Surg. 2005;140(9):849–855. - PubMed
    1. Aranha GV, Aaron JM, Shoup M, Pickleman J. Current management of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2006;140(4):561–569. - PubMed
    1. Choi SH, Moon HJ, Heo JS, Joh JW, Kim YI. Delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199(2):186–191. - PubMed
    1. Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S, et al. French Associations for Surgical Research. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery. 2006;139(5):591–598. - PubMed