Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000-2005
- PMID: 18491102
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1043-5
Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands, 2000-2005
Abstract
We prospectively assessed trends in utilization and costs of diagnostic services of screen-positive women in a biennial breast cancer screening program for women aged 50-75 years. All 2,062 women with suspicious findings at screening mammography in the southern region of the Netherlands between 1 January 2000 and 1 July 2005 (158,997 screens) were included. Data were collected on any diagnostic examinations, interventional procedures, and surgical consultations with two-year follow-up. We used national reimbursement rates to estimate imaging costs and percutaneous biopsy costs. Cost prices, charged by hospitals, were used to estimate open surgical biopsy costs and surgical consultation costs. The largest increase in utilization of diagnostic procedures per 100 referrals was observed for axillary ultrasound (from 3.9 in 2000 to 33.5 in 2005) and for stereotactic core biopsy (from 2.1 in 2000 to 26.8 in 2005). Per 100 referrals, the open surgical biopsy rate decreased from 34.7 (2000) to 4.6 (2005) and the number of outpatient surgical consultations fluctuated between 269.8 (2000) and 309.7 (2004). Mean costs for the diagnosis of one cancer were Euro1,501 and ranged from Euro1,223 (2002) to Euro1,647 (2003). Surgical biopsies comprised 54.1% of total diagnostic costs for women screened in 2000, but decreased to 9.9% for women screened in 2005. Imaging costs increased from 23.7 to 43.8%, percutaneous biopsy costs from 9.9 to 27.2%, and consultation costs from 12.3 to 19.1%. We conclude that diagnostic costs per screen-detected cancer remained fairly stable through the years, although huge changes in the use of different diagnostic procedures were observed.
Similar articles
-
Performance Goals for an Adjunct Diagnostic Test to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies After Screening Mammography: Analysis of Costs, Benefits, and Consequences.J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Nov;13(11S):R81-R88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.09.032. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016. PMID: 27814820
-
Dutch digital breast cancer screening: implications for breast cancer care.Eur J Public Health. 2012 Dec;22(6):925-9. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr170. Epub 2011 Dec 8. Eur J Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22158996
-
Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):924-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24295942
-
[Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].Rofo. 2006 Oct;178(10):957-69. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-926959. Rofo. 2006. PMID: 17021975 Review. German.
-
The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand.Health Policy. 1996 Nov;38(2):101-15. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00843-3. Health Policy. 1996. PMID: 10160378 Review.
Cited by
-
Inter-observer variability in mammography screening and effect of type and number of readers on screening outcome.Br J Cancer. 2009 Mar 24;100(6):901-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604954. Epub 2009 Mar 3. Br J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19259088 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study.Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 9;14(1):R10. doi: 10.1186/bcr3091. Breast Cancer Res. 2012. PMID: 22230363 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics and screening outcome of women referred twice at screening mammography.Eur Radiol. 2012 Dec;22(12):2624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2523-1. Epub 2012 Jun 13. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22696156
-
Discrepant screening mammography assessments at blinded and non-blinded double reading: impact of arbitration by a third reader on screening outcome.Eur Radiol. 2015 Oct;25(10):2821-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3711-6. Epub 2015 Apr 18. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25894007
-
Time trends and geographic variation in use of minimally invasive breast biopsy.J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):814-24; discussion 824-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.007. Epub 2013 Feb 1. J Am Coll Surg. 2013. PMID: 23376029 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical