Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review
- PMID: 18492307
- DOI: 10.1017/S0022215108002533
Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Examination of the upper aerodigestive tract is an important part of ENT practice. The use of both flexible and rigid nasendoscopes is the most common way of achieving this in the out-patient setting. However, these procedures can cause pain or discomfort for the patient, and topical preparations have been used in an attempt to reduce this.
Objectives: The variability in current practice amongst those performing nasendoscopy may suggest an uncertainty as to what constitutes best practice for this procedure. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken in an attempt to clarify this.
Methods: A literature search of the Cochrane ENT group trials register, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL (1982-2007), MEDLINE (1950-2007) and EMBASE (1974-2007) was performed. Reference lists of selected studies were scanned for additional research material.
Results: Eighteen studies relevant to this review were identified. The evidence suggests that local anaesthetic is not beneficial when performing flexible nasendoscopy, neither alone nor in combination with a vasoconstrictor. Water is better than lubricant for flexible endoscope passage and gives a superior optical outcome. Further research is required on the use of endosheaths for flexible and rigid nasendoscopy.
Comment in
-
Re: Nasal and instrument preparation prior to rigid and flexible nasendoscopy: a systematic review.J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Oct;123(10):1188; author reply 1188-9. doi: 10.1017/S002221510900557X. Epub 2009 May 20. J Laryngol Otol. 2009. PMID: 19457273 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
