This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

Comment

. 2008 Jun;8(2):83-4.

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.03.007.

The risk of failure is higher for composites than for amalgam restorations

Elliot Abt¹

Affiliations

PMID: 18492579
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.03.007

Comment

The risk of failure is higher for composites than for amalgam restorations

Elliot Abt. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2008 Jun.

. 2008 Jun;8(2):83-4.

doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.03.007.

Author

Elliot Abt¹

Affiliation

¹ Department of Dentistry, Illinois Masonic Medical Center, USA. eabt7@sbcglobal.net

PMID: 18492579
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.03.007

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Bernardo M, et al. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):775-83. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007. PMID: 17545266 Clinical Trial.

Publication types

Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- ClinicalKey
- Elsevier Science