Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov 25:1242:283-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.090. Epub 2008 Apr 13.

Multisensory integration in children: a preliminary ERP study

Affiliations

Multisensory integration in children: a preliminary ERP study

Barbara A Brett-Green et al. Brain Res. .

Abstract

The spatio-temporal scalp distribution of multisensory auditory-somatosensory integration was investigated in typically developing children ages 6-13. Event-related potentials were recorded from 32 scalp electrodes while participants watched a silent cartoon. Three types of sensory stimulation were presented pseudo-randomly: auditory clicks, somatosensory median nerve electrical pulses, or simultaneous auditory and somatosensory stimuli. No behavioral responses were required of the participant. To examine integration, responses to simultaneous auditory and somatosensory stimulation were compared to the sum of unisensory auditory plus unisensory somatosensory responses for four time-windows: (60-80 ms, 80-110 ms, 110-150 ms and 180-220 ms). Results indicated significant multisensory integration occurred in central/post-central scalp regions between 60-80 ms in the hemisphere contralateral to the side of somatosensory stimulation and between 110-150 ms in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the side of somatosensory stimulation. Between 180-220 ms, significant multisensory integration was evident in central/post-central regions in both hemispheres as well as midline scalp regions. This study suggests that children exhibit differential processing of multisensory compared to unisensory stimuli, as has previously been reported in adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Event Related Potentials (ERPs). The grand averages of event related potentials (ERPs) for auditory (black traces), somatosensory (red traces) and simultaneous auditory and somatosensory stimuli (green traces) are shown for a sample of 21 children. The ERPs are shown at midline electrode sites (Fz, Cz and Pz) and central/post-central electrode sites (C3, CP5, C4 and CP6). The P100, N100 and P200 ERP amplitude peaks are labeled at electrode site Cz. The placement of the electrode sites are indicated in a top view schematic in the upper left corner.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ERP voltage maps. The spatio-temporal distribution of grand average auditory and somatosensory ERPs are displayed in 20 ms intervals. The key to the right shows the range of voltages (in µV) for both types of ERPs.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Auditory–somatosensory multisensory integration (MSI). The grand averages of ERPs for 21 children are shown for the seven electrode sites (Fz, Cz Pz, C3, CP5, C4 and CP6) designated in the schematic in the upper left-hand corner. Simultaneous auditory and somatosensory ERPs (green traces) are compared to the sum of unisensory auditory added to unisensory somatosensory ERPs (orange traces). Difference waves (black traces = simultaneous – summed) identify possible scalp locations for MSI.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
P-values for MSI. Significant p values are displayed over time for 32 electrodes from running t-tests comparing the simultaneous (AS) and summed (A+S) ERPs. Statistically significant p values ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 are represented by the color code (key is to the right of graph). Time is plotted on the x-axis from 0 to 400 ms. Electrode sites are plotted on the y-axis.

References

    1. Bruneau N, Roux S, Guerin P, Barthelemy C, Lelord G. Temporal prominence of auditory evoked potentials (N1 wave) in 4–8-year-old children. Psychophysiology. 1997;34(1):32–38. - PubMed
    1. Calvert GA, Thesen T. Multisensory integration: methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. J. Physiol. Paris. 2004;98(1–3):191–205. - PubMed
    1. Di S, Brett B, Barth DS. Polysensory evoked potentials in rat parietotemporal cortex: Combined auditory and somatosensory responses. Brain Res. 1994;642(1–2):267–280. - PubMed
    1. Fort A, Delpuech C, Pernier J, Giard MH. Dynamics of cortico-subcortical cross-modal operations involved in audio-visual object detection in humans. Cereb. Cortex. 2002;12:1031–1039. - PubMed
    1. Foxe JJ, Morocz IA, Murray MM, Higgins BA, Javitt DC, Schroeder CE. Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping. Cogn. Brain Res. 2000;10(1–2):77–83. - PubMed

Publication types