Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: a systematic review
- PMID: 18495416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.11.010
Screening for psychological distress in palliative care: a systematic review
Abstract
Psychological distress is common in the terminally ill. It is often underdetected and undertreated and has significant impact on the individual and family. There is a growing consensus on a broader concept of psychological suffering conceptualized as "distress" in the palliative care setting. Psychological screening programs play an important role in improving detection and management of distress. National and international guidelines recommend routine screening. This systematic review summarizes the evidence for screening for psychological distress in a palliative care setting. The review includes studies that compare screening questionnaires against a gold standard criterion of semistructured or structured psychiatric interview. Eight studies were identified which examined the performance of 10 screening questionnaires, ranging from single items to multidimensional questionnaires with up to 33 items. The performances of these questionnaires are described in terms of their sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. There are very few studies that examine the validity of questionnaires against credible criteria such as psychiatric interview and most studies have so far focused on depression. Unidimensional scales appear to perform equally well compared to the longer versions. This review summarizes the evidence, the quality of this evidence, and future challenges to improve identification and management of distress in palliative care.
Similar articles
-
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39367772 Free PMC article.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532239
-
Effectiveness of family interventions on psychological distress and expressed emotion in family members of individuals diagnosed with first-episode psychosis: a systematic review.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Apr;15(4):1057-1079. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003361. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017. PMID: 28398985
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
Cited by
-
Guidelines for the psychosocial and bereavement support of family caregivers of palliative care patients.J Palliat Med. 2012 Jun;15(6):696-702. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0466. Epub 2012 Mar 2. J Palliat Med. 2012. PMID: 22385026 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing distress, the 6th vital sign, in an oncology pain clinic.Curr Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(2):e53-9. doi: 10.3747/co.19.882. Curr Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22514497 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Anxiety in Routine Palliative Care Using Bayesian-Inspired Association Rule Mining.Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 25;3:724049. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.724049. eCollection 2021. Front Digit Health. 2021. PMID: 34713190 Free PMC article.
-
Enhancing nurses' communication about psychosocial needs and changes in intimacy and sexuality in patients with advanced cancer: a mixed-method study.Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 Apr 26;8:100335. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100335. eCollection 2025 Jun. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025. PMID: 40384851 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of bias from inclusion of patients who already have diagnosis of or are undergoing treatment for depression in diagnostic accuracy studies of screening tools for depression: systematic review.BMJ. 2011 Aug 18;343:d4825. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4825. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21852353 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical