Current practice in nutritional support and its association with mortality in septic patients--results from a national, prospective, multicenter study
- PMID: 18496367
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318174dcf0
Current practice in nutritional support and its association with mortality in septic patients--results from a national, prospective, multicenter study
Abstract
Objective: To identify current clinical practice regarding nutrition and its association with morbidity and mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in Germany.
Design: Nationwide prospective, observational, cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence study.
Setting: The study included 454 intensive care units from a representative sample of 310 hospitals stratified by size.
Patients: Participants were 415 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock (according to criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference).
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Data were collected by on-site audits of trained external study physicians during randomly scheduled visits during 1 yr. Valid data on nutrition were available for 399 of 415 patients. The data showed that 20.1% of patients received exclusively enteral nutrition, 35.1% exclusively parenteral nutrition, and 34.6% mixed nutrition (parenteral and enteral); 10.3% were not fed at all. Patients with gastrointestinal/intra-abdominal infection, pancreatitis or neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract, mechanical ventilation, or septic shock were less likely to receive exclusively enteral nutrition. Median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment scores were significantly different among the nutrition groups. Overall hospital mortality was 55.2%. Hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients receiving exclusively parenteral (62.3%) or mixed nutrition (57.1%) than in patients with exclusively enteral nutrition (38.9%) (p = .005). After adjustment for patient morbidity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, presence of septic shock) and treatment factors (mechanical ventilation), multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of parenteral nutrition was significantly predictive of mortality (odds ratio, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.37).
Conclusions: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in German intensive care units received preferentially parenteral or mixed nutrition. The use of parenteral nutrition was associated with an increased risk of death.
Comment in
-
Death by TPN... the final chapter?Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1964-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31817612d6. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18520654 No abstract available.
-
Parenteral nutrition in intensive care patients with sepsis: is it dangerous when indications are complied?Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):1176-7; author reply 1177. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181986f32. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19237961 No abstract available.
-
Sepsis, mortality, and parenteral nutrition: the risk of dualism on nutritional support.Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):1179; author reply 1179-80. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181986e1e. Crit Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19237966 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Practice and perception--a nationwide survey of therapy habits in sepsis.Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2719-25. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186b6f3. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18766100
-
Acute renal failure in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock--a significant independent risk factor for mortality: results from the German Prevalence Study.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008 Mar;23(3):904-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm610. Epub 2007 Dec 7. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008. PMID: 18065435
-
Survival analysis of 314 episodes of sepsis in medical intensive care unit in university hospital: impact of intensive care unit performance and antimicrobial therapy.Croat Med J. 2006 Jun;47(3):385-97. Croat Med J. 2006. PMID: 16758516 Free PMC article.
-
Preliminary evidence for a medical nutrition therapy protocol: enteral feedings for critically ill patients.J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Aug;106(8):1226-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.05.320. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006. PMID: 16863719 Review.
-
Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in critically ill adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Crit Care Med. 2007 Dec;35(12):2686-92. Crit Care Med. 2007. PMID: 18074465 Review.
Cited by
-
Nutrition in critical illness: a current conundrum.F1000Res. 2016 Oct 18;5:2531. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9278.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 27803805 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enteral nutrition in critical care.J Clin Med Res. 2013 Feb;5(1):1-11. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1210w. Epub 2013 Jan 11. J Clin Med Res. 2013. PMID: 23390469 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Nutrients. 2020 Sep 28;12(10):2968. doi: 10.3390/nu12102968. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32998412 Free PMC article.
-
Proximal gut mucosal epithelial homeostasis in aged IL-1 type I receptor knockout mice after starvation.J Surg Res. 2011 Aug;169(2):209-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.056. Epub 2010 Apr 21. J Surg Res. 2011. PMID: 20605606 Free PMC article.
-
Sepsis in the intensive care unit.Surgery (Oxf). 2015 Nov;33(11):565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Surgery (Oxf). 2015. PMID: 32287818 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources