Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr 22:8:e23.

Management of contaminated autologous grafts in plastic surgery

Robert F Centeno  1 , Ankit R Desai, Marla E Watson
Affiliations

Management of contaminated autologous grafts in plastic surgery

Robert F Centeno et al. Eplasty. .

Abstract

Background: Contamination of autologous grafts unfortunately occurs in plastic surgery, but the literature provides no guidance for management of such incidents.

Methods: American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery members were asked to complete an online survey that asked about the number and causes of graft contaminations experienced, how surgeons dealt with the problem, the clinical outcomes, and patient disclosure.

Results: Nineteen hundred surgeons were asked to participate in the survey, and 223 responded. Of these, 70% had experienced at least 1 graft contamination incident, with 26% experiencing 4 or more. The most frequently reported reason for graft contamination was a graft falling on the floor (reported by 75%). Nearly two thirds of the contaminated grafts related to craniofacial procedures. Ninety-four percent of grafts were managed with decontamination and completion of the operation. The most common method of decontamination was washing with povidone-iodine, but this practice is contrary to recommendations in the literature. Only 3 surgeons (1.9%) said a clinical infection developed following decontaminated graft use. Patients were not informed in 60% of graft contamination incidents. The survey results and review of the literature led to development of algorithms for the management of inadvertent graft contamination and patient disclosure.

Conclusions: Although autologous grafts do become contaminated in plastic surgery, the overwhelming majority can be safely decontaminated and produce minimal or no clinical sequelae. The algorithms presented are intended to serve as guides for prevention of contamination events or for their management should they occur.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Survey sent to plastic surgeons on management of contaminated grafts.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perioperative autograft harvest algorithm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative algorithm for contaminated autograft.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Postoperative algorithm for contaminated graft.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991;91:S152–7. - PubMed
    1. Presnal BP, Kimbrough EE. What to do about a dropped bone graft. Clin Orthop. 1993;296:310–1. - PubMed
    1. Cooper DE, Arnozcky SP, Warren RF. Contaminated Patellar Tendon Grafts: Incidence Of Positive Culture And Efficacy Of An Antibiotic Solution Soak—An In Vitro Study. Arthroscopy. 1991;7:272–4. - PubMed
    1. Hirn M, Laitinen M, Pirkkalainen S, Vuento R. Cefuroxime, rifampicin, and pulse lavage in decontamination of allograft bone. J Hosp Infect. 2004;56:198–201. - PubMed
    1. Molina ME, Nonweiller DE, Evans JA, Delee JC. Contaminated anterior cruciate ligament grafts: the efficacy of 3 sterilization agents. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:373–8. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources