Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 May;13(3):395-406.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-008-0363-z. Epub 2008 May 22.

Baby BEEP: A randomized controlled trial of nurses' individualized social support for poor rural pregnant smokers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Baby BEEP: A randomized controlled trial of nurses' individualized social support for poor rural pregnant smokers

Linda Bullock et al. Matern Child Health J. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objectives: We tested the effect of nurse-delivered telephone individualized social support ("Baby BEEP") and eight mailed prenatal smoking cessation booklets singly and in combination (2 x 2 factorial design) on smoking cessation in low-income rural pregnant women (N = 695; 75% participation).

Methods: Participants randomized to Baby BEEP groups (n = 345) received weekly calls throughout pregnancy plus 24-7 beeper access. Saliva cotinine samples were collected monthly from all groups by other nurses at home visits up to 6 weeks post-delivery. Primary outcomes were point prevalence abstinence (cotinine < 30 ng/ml) in late pregnancy and post-delivery.

Results: Only 47 women were lost to follow-up. Intent-to-treat analyses showed no difference across intervention groups (17-22%, late pregnancy; 11-13.5%, postpartum), and no difference from the controls (17%, late pregnancy; 13%, postpartum). Post hoc analyses of study completers suggested a four percentage-point advantage for the intervention groups over controls in producing early and mid-pregnancy continuous abstainers. Partner smoking had no effect on late pregnancy abstinence (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 0.95, 3.2), but post-delivery, the effect was pronounced (OR = 3.2, 95% CI = 1.8, 5.9).

Conclusions: High abstinence rates in the controls indicate the power of biologic monitoring and home visits to assess stress, support, depression, and intimate partner violence; these elements plus booklets were as effective as more intensive interventions. Targeting partners who smoke is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fertil Steril. 2000 Sep;74(3):498-503 - PubMed
    1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2001;1:2 - PubMed
    1. Tob Control. 2000;9 Suppl 3:III72-4 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(3):CD000198 - PubMed
    1. Tob Control. 2000;9 Suppl 3:III29-35 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources