Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
- PMID: 18497416
- PMCID: PMC2394579
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
Erratum in
- BMJ.2008 Jun 21;336(7658): doi:10.1136/bmj.a403
Abstract
Guideline panellists have differing opinions on whether resource use should influence decisions on individual patients. As medical care costs rise, resource use considerations become more compelling, but panellists may find dealing with such considerations challenging
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors are involved in the dissemination of GRADE, and GRADE’s success has a positive influence on their academic career. Listed authors have received travel reimbursement and honorariums for presentations that included a review of GRADE’s approach to rating quality of evidence and grading recommendations. GHG acts as a consultant to UpToDate; his work includes helping UpToDate in their use of GRADE. HJS is documents editor and methodologist for the American Thoracic Society; one of his roles in these positions is helping implement the use of GRADE. He is supported by “The human factor, mobility and Marie Curie actions scientist reintegration European commission grant: IGR 42192—GRADE.” AL is helping the use of GRADE by different institutions within the Italian NHS and in this role he has implemented GRADE to produce clinical recommendations in oncology through Grant No 249 (2005-7), Bando Ricerca Finalizzata, Ministero della Salute, Roma, Italy.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(3):256-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 May 24. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013. PMID: 23790708 German.
-
GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):140-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.04.012. Epub 2012 Aug 3. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 22863410 Review.
-
Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines.BMJ. 1999 Feb 27;318(7183):593-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7183.593. BMJ. 1999. PMID: 10037645 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Expanded programme on immunization. Global Advisory Group--Part I.Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1992 Jan 17;67(3):11-5. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1992. PMID: 1736955 English, French. No abstract available.
-
Allocating resources.Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990;6(1):77-92. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300008941. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1990. PMID: 2113892
Cited by
-
Methodology for the development of antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):53S-70S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2288. Chest. 2012. PMID: 22315256 Free PMC article.
-
Acupuncture and moxibustion for primary osteoporosis: An overview of systematic review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(9):e19334. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019334. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 32118767 Free PMC article.
-
International Digestive Endoscopy Network consensus on the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.Clin Endosc. 2024 Mar;57(2):141-157. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.002. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Clin Endosc. 2024. PMID: 38556472 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of Bell palsy: clinical practice guideline.CMAJ. 2014 Sep 2;186(12):917-22. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131801. Epub 2014 Jun 16. CMAJ. 2014. PMID: 24934895 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The Japan Society for Surgical Infection: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of gastroenterological surgical site infection, 2018.Surg Today. 2021 Jan;51(1):1-31. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02181-6. Epub 2020 Dec 15. Surg Today. 2021. PMID: 33320283 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, Halperin J, Maurer J, Owens DK, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006;129:182-7. - PubMed
-
- Russell LB. Opportunity costs in modern medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 1992;11:162-9. - PubMed
-
- Eddy DM. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 1990;263:2493, 2498, 2501. - PubMed
-
- Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877-90. - PubMed
-
- Simon J, Gray A, Duley L. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium sulphate for 9996 women with pre-eclampsia from 33 countries: economic evaluation of the magpie trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;113:144-51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials