Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 May 24;336(7654):1170-3.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80.

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ.2008 Jun 21;336(7658): doi:10.1136/bmj.a403

Abstract

Guideline panellists have differing opinions on whether resource use should influence decisions on individual patients. As medical care costs rise, resource use considerations become more compelling, but panellists may find dealing with such considerations challenging

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors are involved in the dissemination of GRADE, and GRADE’s success has a positive influence on their academic career. Listed authors have received travel reimbursement and honorariums for presentations that included a review of GRADE’s approach to rating quality of evidence and grading recommendations. GHG acts as a consultant to UpToDate; his work includes helping UpToDate in their use of GRADE. HJS is documents editor and methodologist for the American Thoracic Society; one of his roles in these positions is helping implement the use of GRADE. He is supported by “The human factor, mobility and Marie Curie actions scientist reintegration European commission grant: IGR 42192—GRADE.” AL is helping the use of GRADE by different institutions within the Italian NHS and in this role he has implemented GRADE to produce clinical recommendations in oncology through Grant No 249 (2005-7), Bando Ricerca Finalizzata, Ministero della Salute, Roma, Italy.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, Halperin J, Maurer J, Owens DK, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006;129:182-7. - PubMed
    1. Russell LB. Opportunity costs in modern medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 1992;11:162-9. - PubMed
    1. Eddy DM. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 1990;263:2493, 2498, 2501. - PubMed
    1. Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877-90. - PubMed
    1. Simon J, Gray A, Duley L. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium sulphate for 9996 women with pre-eclampsia from 33 countries: economic evaluation of the magpie trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;113:144-51. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms