Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
- PMID: 18497416
- PMCID: PMC2394579
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
Erratum in
- BMJ.2008 Jun 21;336(7658): doi:10.1136/bmj.a403
Abstract
Guideline panellists have differing opinions on whether resource use should influence decisions on individual patients. As medical care costs rise, resource use considerations become more compelling, but panellists may find dealing with such considerations challenging
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors are involved in the dissemination of GRADE, and GRADE’s success has a positive influence on their academic career. Listed authors have received travel reimbursement and honorariums for presentations that included a review of GRADE’s approach to rating quality of evidence and grading recommendations. GHG acts as a consultant to UpToDate; his work includes helping UpToDate in their use of GRADE. HJS is documents editor and methodologist for the American Thoracic Society; one of his roles in these positions is helping implement the use of GRADE. He is supported by “The human factor, mobility and Marie Curie actions scientist reintegration European commission grant: IGR 42192—GRADE.” AL is helping the use of GRADE by different institutions within the Italian NHS and in this role he has implemented GRADE to produce clinical recommendations in oncology through Grant No 249 (2005-7), Bando Ricerca Finalizzata, Ministero della Salute, Roma, Italy.
References
-
- Guyatt G, Baumann M, Pauker S, Halperin J, Maurer J, Owens DK, et al. Addressing resource allocation issues in recommendations from clinical practice guideline panels: suggestions from an American College of Chest Physicians task force. Chest 2006;129:182-7. - PubMed
-
- Russell LB. Opportunity costs in modern medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 1992;11:162-9. - PubMed
-
- Eddy DM. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 1990;263:2493, 2498, 2501. - PubMed
-
- Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The magpie trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1877-90. - PubMed
-
- Simon J, Gray A, Duley L. Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic magnesium sulphate for 9996 women with pre-eclampsia from 33 countries: economic evaluation of the magpie trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2006;113:144-51. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials