Reasons for declining computerized insulin protocol recommendations: application of a framework
- PMID: 18499528
- PMCID: PMC2490709
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.04.002
Reasons for declining computerized insulin protocol recommendations: application of a framework
Abstract
Clinical decision support systems (CDS) can interpret detailed treatment protocols for ICU care providers. In open-loop systems, clinicians can decline protocol recommendations. We capture their reasons for declining as part of ongoing, iterative protocol validation and refinement processes. Even though our protocol was well-accepted by clinicians overall, noncompliance patterns revealed potential protocol improvement targets, and suggested ways to reduce barriers impeding software use. We applied Rita Kukafka and colleagues' (2003) IT implementation framework to identify and categorize reasons documented by ICU nurses when declining recommendations from an insulin-titration protocol. Two methods were used to operationalize the framework: reasons for declining recommendations from actual software use, and a nurse questionnaire. Applying the framework exposed limitations of our data sources, and suggested ways to address those limitations; and facilitated our analyses and interpretations.
References
-
- Morris AH. Treatment algorithms and protocolized care. Current Opinion in Critical Care. 2003;9:236–40. - PubMed
-
- Kuperman G, James B, Jacobsen J, Gardner RM. Continuous quality improvement applied to medical care: experiences at LDS hospital. Med Decis Making. 1991:11. - PubMed
-
- Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 2000. - PubMed
-
- Agrawal A, Mayo-Smith MF. Adherence to computerized clinical reminders in a large healthcare delivery network. Medinfo. 2004;11(pt 1):111–114. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
