Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May 27;10(3):e15.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.1053.

Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data

Jeana H Frost  1 , Michael P Massagli
Affiliations

Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data

Jeana H Frost et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: This project investigates the ways in which patients respond to the shared use of what is often considered private information: personal health data. There is a growing demand for patient access to personal health records. The predominant model for this record is a repository of all clinically relevant health information kept securely and viewed privately by patients and their health care providers. While this type of record does seem to have beneficial effects for the patient-physician relationship, the complexity and novelty of these data coupled with the lack of research in this area means the utility of personal health information for the primary stakeholders-the patients-is not well documented or understood.

Objective: PatientsLikeMe is an online community built to support information exchange between patients. The site provides customized disease-specific outcome and visualization tools to help patients understand and share information about their condition. We begin this paper by describing the components and design of the online community. We then identify and analyze how users of this platform reference personal health information within patient-to-patient dialogues.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) post data on their current treatments, symptoms, and outcomes. These data are displayed graphically within personal health profiles and are reflected in composite community-level symptom and treatment reports. Users review and discuss these data within the Forum, private messaging, and comments posted on each other's profiles. We analyzed member communications that referenced individual-level personal health data to determine how patient peers use personal health information within patient-to-patient exchanges.

Results: Qualitative analysis of a sample of 123 comments (about 2% of the total) posted within the community revealed a variety of commenting and questioning behaviors by patient members. Members referenced data to locate others with particular experiences to answer specific health-related questions, to proffer personally acquired disease-management knowledge to those most likely to benefit from it, and to foster and solidify relationships based on shared concerns.

Conclusions: Few studies examine the use of personal health information by patients themselves. This project suggests how patients who choose to explicitly share health data within a community may benefit from the process, helping them engage in dialogues that may inform disease self-management. We recommend that future designs make each patient's health information as clear as possible, automate matching of people with similar conditions and using similar treatments, and integrate data into online platforms for health conversations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jeana Frost and Michael Massagli are employees of PatientsLikeMe.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Individual summary information (the “nugget”)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Charts comprising the personal profile
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient profile of PatientsLikeMe member “D” (with added explanatory remark "Based on the charts..", which is not part of the original screenshot)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pagliari Claudia, Detmer Don, Singleton Peter. Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ. 2007 Aug 18;335(7615):330–3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39279.482963.AD.335/7615/330 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markle Foundation, authors. Connecting for Health. Connecting Americans to Their Healthcare. Final Report. Working Group on Policies for Electronic Information Sharing Between Doctors and Patients. New York: Markle Foundation; 2004. http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/wg_eis_final_report_0704.pdf.
    1. Tjora Aksel, Tran Trung, Faxvaag Arild. Privacy vs usability: a qualitative exploration of patients' experiences with secure Internet communication with their general practitioner. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e15. http://www.jmir.org/2005/2/e15/v7i2e15 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim Eung-Hun, Wang Maisie, Lau Christopher, Kim Yongmin. Application and evaluation of personal health information management system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;5:3159–62. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2004.1403891. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Robeznieks Andis. Getting personal. Legal liability, patient-data overload among issues making physicians uneasy over emergence of personal health records. Mod Healthc. 2007 May 21;37(21):40–2. - PubMed