Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival
- PMID: 18504245
- DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn120
Correcting for lead time and length bias in estimating the effect of screen detection on cancer survival
Abstract
Determination of survival time among persons with screen-detected cancer is subject to lead time and length biases. The authors propose a simple correction for lead time, assuming an exponential distribution of the preclinical screen-detectable period. Assuming two latent categories of tumors, one of which is more prone to screen detection and correspondingly less prone to death from the cancer in question, the authors have developed a strategy of sensitivity analysis for various magnitudes of length bias. Here they demonstrate these methods using a series of 25,962 breast cancer cases (1988-2004) from the West Midlands, United Kingdom.
Similar articles
-
Population estimates of survival in women with screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancer taking account of lead time and length bias.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jul;116(1):179-85. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0100-8. Epub 2008 Jul 12. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009. PMID: 18622697
-
Are international differences in breast cancer survival between Australia and the UK present amongst both screen-detected women and non-screen-detected women? survival estimates for women diagnosed in West Midlands and New South Wales 1997-2006.Int J Cancer. 2016 May 15;138(10):2404-14. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29984. Epub 2016 Feb 23. Int J Cancer. 2016. PMID: 26756306 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous tumour growth models, lead time estimation and length bias in breast cancer screening studies.Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Feb;29(2):374-395. doi: 10.1177/0962280219832901. Epub 2019 Mar 10. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020. PMID: 30854935
-
Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Dec;17(6):643-63. doi: 10.1177/0962280207087309. Epub 2008 Apr 29. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008. PMID: 18445697 Review.
-
Bias in breast cancer research in the screening era.Breast. 2013 Dec;22(6):1041-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.046. Epub 2013 Aug 26. Breast. 2013. PMID: 23988397 Review.
Cited by
-
Survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with versus without prior cancer.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 15;13(1):4269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30850-2. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36922574 Free PMC article.
-
Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients.Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Oct;29(10):6163-6188. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12133-8. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Ann Surg Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35876923 Review.
-
Explaining the difference in prognosis between screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers.Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1680-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.144. Epub 2011 May 3. Br J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21540862 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial: The Effect of Bias on Estimation of Improved Survival After Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus.Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;112(8):1265-1266. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.185. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 28766563 Free PMC article.
-
Letter to the editor for the article "The impact of non-structured PSA testing on prostate cancer-specific mortality on New Zealand Māori men".World J Urol. 2024 Nov 6;42(1):628. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05327-0. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39503922 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical