Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;17(12):1216-24.
doi: 10.1002/pon.1350.

The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure

Affiliations

The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF): a new measure

Laura A Siminoff et al. Psychooncology. 2008 Dec.

Erratum in

Abstract

Objectives: Caregivers and cancer patients frequently have conflicting and unmet communication needs. The Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Patients and Families (CCAT-PF) is a new instrument that assesses congruence in patient-family caregiver communication for both research and clinical purposes.

Methods: The scale was developed using a sample of 190 lung cancer patient-caregiver pairs. Standard psychometric procedures were used to develop and test the scale including qualitative item pool development, item reduction and ascertainment of scale properties.

Results: The multiple correlation of the 18-item CCAT-PF scale with the longer 30-item scale was 0.94. All but three items had less than 20% variance accounted for when each item was regressed on the remaining 17, indicating that responses to an individual item were not readily predicted by the remaining items. Test re-test reliability was 0.35 and Cronbach's alpha was 0.49 as the CCAT-PF scale represents the sum of mostly independent items. Higher CCAT-PF scores were significantly correlated with greater patient depression, greater patient perceived family conflict, lower patient-caregiver assessment and well-being and less expressiveness and family cohesion. For both patients and caregivers, physical, functional and emotional well-being were not associated with CCAT-PF scores.

Conclusion: The CCAT-PF is a brief but reliable and valid tool. Although administering both family and patient versions is optimal, administering it to a patient or family caregiver only also produces reliable information.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kissane DW, Bloch S, Burns WI, et al. Perceptions of family functioning and cancer. Psycho-oncology. 1994;3:259–269.
    1. Kissane DW, McKenzie M, McKenzie DP, et al. Psychosocial morbidity associated with patterns of family functioning in palliative care: Baseline data from the Family Focused Grief Therapy controlled trial. Palliat Med. 2003;17:527–537. - PubMed
    1. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Slutsman J, et al. Understanding economic and other burdens of terminal illness: the experience of patients and their caregivers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:451–459. - PubMed
    1. Given BA, Given CW, Kozachik S. Family Support in Advanced Cancer. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2000;51:213–231. - PubMed
    1. Cameron JI, Franche R, Cheung AM, et al. Lifestyle interference and emotional distress in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients. Cancer. 2002;94:521–527. - PubMed

Publication types