Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Mar-Apr;28(2B):1335-9.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma

Affiliations
  • PMID: 18505075
Free article

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the conservative treatment of anal canal carcinoma

Nicola Raffetto et al. Anticancer Res. 2008 Mar-Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in patients with anal canal carcinoma.

Patients and methods: Between 1990 and 2006, 83 patients affected by anal canal carcinoma were treated at the Radiotherapy Department of "La Sapienza" University of Rome. In all patients, a daily dose of 1.8 Gy, five times per week, was given for a total dose of 45 Gy for the whole pelvis (CTV1) and of 55-60 Gy for the tumor bed (CTV2). In 63 patients, chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycinC (MMC) or cisplatin delivery during the first and last week of radiotherapy.

Results: The median follow-up time for all patients was 56.2 months. Treatment response was considered complete in 53 patients (63.8%) and partial in 30 patients (36.1%). Local tumor relapse was observed in 13 patients (15.6%). The probability of overall survival for all patients at 5 years was 75%: 39% in patients who underwent radiotherapy alone and 85% in patients who underwent radiochemotherapy (p=0.0013). Concerning acute toxicity, 9 patients developed grade 1 skin toxicity (10.8%), 35 grade 2 (42.1%), 26 grade 3 (31.3%) and 3 grade 4 (3.6%); eleven patients had grade 2 diarrhea (14.5%) and 2 grade 3 diarrhea (2.4%).

Conclusion: This analysis suggests that the treatment scheme employed was effective for anal sphincter preservation and local control.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources