Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun 17;98(12):1922-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604407. Epub 2008 May 27.

The influence of sentinel lymph node tumour burden on additional lymph node involvement and disease-free survival in cutaneous melanoma--a retrospective analysis of 392 cases

Affiliations

The influence of sentinel lymph node tumour burden on additional lymph node involvement and disease-free survival in cutaneous melanoma--a retrospective analysis of 392 cases

M Guggenheim et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Twenty per cent of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive melanoma patients have positive non-SLN lymph nodes in completion lymph node dissection (CLND). We investigated SLN tumour load, non-sentinel positivity and disease-free survival (DFS) to assess whether certain patients could be spared CLND. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed on 392 patients between 1999 and 2005. Median observation period was 38.8 months. Sentinel lymph node tumour load did not predict non-SLN positivity: 30.8% of patients with SLN macrometastases (> or =2 mm) and 16.4% with micrometastases (< or =2 mm) had non-SLN positivity (P=0.09). Tumour recurrences after positive SLNs were more than twice as frequent for SLN macrometastases (51.3%) than for micrometastases (24.6%) (P=0.005). For patients with SLN micrometastases, the DFS analysis was worse (P=0.003) when comparing those with positive non-SLNs (60% recurrences) to those without (17.6% recurrences). This difference did not translate into significant differences in DFS: patients with SLN micrometastasis, either with (P=0.022) or without additional positive non-SLNs (P<0.0001), fared worse than patients with tumour-free SLNs. The 2-mm cutoff for SLN tumour load accurately predicts differences in DFS. Non-SLN positivity in CLND, however, cannot be predicted. Therefore, contrary to other studies, no recommendations concerning discontinuation of CLND based on SLN tumour load can be deduced.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of Kaplan–Meier curves for disease-free survival. (A) Sentinel lymph node-positive patients without (solid line) and with (dashed line) additional positive non-SLNs, (B) SLN-positive patients with SLN micrometastases (solid line) and SLN macrometastases (dashed line), (C) SLN-negative patients (solid line), SLN-positive patients with micrometastases without (bold solid line) and with additional positive non-SLNs in CLND (dashed line), and (D) SLN-negative (solid line) and SLN-positive (dashed line) patients. P-values were calculated using a log-rank test.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Therapeutic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials Study Group; Crystal JS, Thompson JF, Hyngstrom J, Caracò C, Zager JS, Jahkola T, Bowles TL, Pennacchioli E, Beitsch PD, Hoekstra HJ, Moncrieff M, Ingvar C, van Akkooi A, Sabel MS, Levine EA, Agnese D, Henderson M, Dummer R, Neves RI, Rossi CR, Kane JM 3rd, Trocha S, Wright F, Byrd DR, Matter M, Hsueh EC, MacKenzie-Ross A, Kelley M, Terheyden P, Huston TL, Wayne JD, Neuman H, Smithers BM, Ariyan CE, Desai D, Gershenwald JE, Schneebaum S, Gesierich A, Jacobs LK, Lewis JM, McMasters KM, O'Donoghue C, van der Westhuizen A, Sardi A, Barth R, Barone R, McKinnon JG, Slingluff CL, Farma JM, Schultz E, Scheri RP, Vidal-Sicart S, Molina M, Testori AAE, Foshag LJ, Van Kreuningen L, Wang HJ, Sim MS, Scolyer RA, Elashoff DE, Cochran AJ, Faries MB. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trials Study Group, et al. JAMA Surg. 2022 Sep 1;157(9):835-842. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2055. JAMA Surg. 2022. PMID: 35921122 Free PMC article.
  • Current management of melanoma patients with nodal metastases.
    Han D, van Akkooi ACJ, Straker RJ 3rd, Shannon AB, Karakousis GC, Wang L, Kim KB, Reintgen D. Han D, et al. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2022 Feb;39(1):181-199. doi: 10.1007/s10585-021-10099-7. Epub 2021 May 7. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2022. PMID: 33961168 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Validation of a clinicopathological and gene expression profile model for sentinel lymph node metastasis in primary cutaneous melanoma.
    Mulder EEAP, Dwarkasing JT, Tempel D, van der Spek A, Bosman L, Verver D, Mooyaart AL, van der Veldt AAM, Verhoef C, Nijsten TEC, Grunhagen DJ, Hollestein LM. Mulder EEAP, et al. Br J Dermatol. 2021 May;184(5):944-951. doi: 10.1111/bjd.19499. Epub 2020 Nov 2. Br J Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 32844403 Free PMC article.
  • Factors predictive of the status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients from a large multicenter database.
    White RL Jr, Ayers GD, Stell VH, Ding S, Gershenwald JE, Salo JC, Pockaj BA, Essner R, Faries M, Charney KJ, Avisar E, Hauschild A, Egberts F, Averbook BJ, Garberoglio CA, Vetto JT, Ross MI, Chu D, Trisal V, Hoekstra H, Whitman E, Wanebo HJ, Debonis D, Vezeridis M, Chevinsky A, Kashani-Sabet M, Shyr Y, Berry L, Zhao Z, Soong SJ, Leong SP; Sentinel Lymph Node Working Group. White RL Jr, et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec;18(13):3593-600. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1826-9. Epub 2011 Jun 7. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21647761 Free PMC article.
  • Enhanced postoperative lymphatic staging of malignant melanoma by endoscopically assisted iliacoinguinal dissection.
    Ising IM, Bembenek A, Gutzmer R, Köckerling F, Moesta KT. Ising IM, et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;397(3):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0888-2. Epub 2011 Dec 24. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012. PMID: 22194038

References

    1. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, Thompson JF, Reintgen DS, Cascinelli N, Urist M, Mcmasters KM, Ross MI, Kirkwood JM, Atkins MB, Thompson JA, Coit DG, Byrd D, Desmond R, Zhang Y, Liu PY, Lyman GH, Morabito A (2001) Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol 19: 3622. - PubMed
    1. Cabanas RM (1977) An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Cancer 39: 456. - PubMed
    1. Carlson GW, Murray DR, Lyles RH, Staley CA, Hestley A, Cohen C (2003) The amount of metastatic melanoma in a sentinel lymph node: does it have prognostic significance? Ann Surg Oncol 10: 575. - PubMed
    1. Cascinelli N, Bombardieri E, Bufalino R, Camerini T, Carbone A, Clemente C, Lenisa L, Mascheroni L, Maurichi A, Pennacchioli E, Patuzzo R, Santinami M, Tragni G (2006) Sentinel and nonsentinel node status in stage IB and II melanoma patients: two-step prognostic indicators of survival. J Clin Oncol 24: 4464. - PubMed
    1. Cochran AJ, Balda BR, Starz H, Bachter D, Krag DN, Cruse CW, Pijpers R, Morton DL (2000) The Augsburg Consensus. Techniques of lymphatic mapping, sentinel lymphadenectomy, and completion lymphadenectomy in cutaneous malignancies. Cancer 89: 236. - PubMed