Analysis of surgical and perioperative complications in seventy-five right hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation
- PMID: 18506919
- PMCID: PMC2712846
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.3159
Analysis of surgical and perioperative complications in seventy-five right hepatectomies for living donor liver transplantation
Abstract
Aim: To present an analysis of the surgical and perioperative complications in a series of seventy-five right hepatectomies for living-donation (RHLD) performed in our center.
Methods: From January 2002 to September 2007, we performed 75 RHLD, defined as removal of a portion of the liver corresponding to Couinaud segments 5-8, in order to obtain a graft for adult to adult living-related liver transplantation (ALRLT). Surgical complications were stratified according to the most recent version of the Clavien classification of postoperative surgical complications. The perioperative period was defined as within 90 d of surgery.
Results: No living donor mortality was present in this series, no donor operation was aborted and no donors received any blood transfusion. Twenty-three (30.6%) living donors presented one or more episodes of complication in the perioperative period. Seven patients (9.33%) out of 75 developed biliary complications, which were the most common complications in our series.
Conclusion: The need to define, categorize and record complications when healthy individuals, such as living donors, undergo a major surgical procedure, such as a right hepatectomy, reflects the need for prompt and detailed reports of complications arising in this particular category of patient. Perioperative complications and post resection liver regeneration are not influenced by anatomic variations or patient demographic.
References
-
- Fortner JG, Blumgart LH. A historic perspective of liver surgery for tumors at the end of the millennium. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:210–222. - PubMed
-
- Gruttadauria S, Vasta F, Minervini MI, Piazza T, Arcadipane A, Marcos A, Gridelli B. Significance of the effective remnant liver volume in major hepatectomies. Am Surg. 2005;71:235–240. - PubMed
-
- Kadry Z, Furukawa H, Todo S, Clavien PA. Assessment of liver function and mass in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers. In: PA FY Clavien, HK Lyerly, MA Morse, AP Venook., editors. Malignant Liver Tumors: Current and Emerging Therapies, 2nd ed. Jones and Bartlett: Sudbury; 2003. pp. 73–78.
-
- Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K. Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors. Transplantation. 1999;67:321–327. - PubMed
-
- Heffron TG, Gruttadauria S, Campi O, Cavanna JM. Surgical innovations in pediatric liver transplantation: reduced-size, split, and living-related transplantation. Prob Gen Surg. 1998;15:104.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
