Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 May-Jun;37(3):315-28.
doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00241.x.

A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment

Affiliations
Review

A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment

Jeanne L Alhusen. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To critically review and synthesize original research published since 2000 designed to measure factors that influence maternal-fetal attachment.

Data sources: EBSCOhost Research Databases that included PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS were searched for journal articles published in the past 7 years (2000-2007) that examined variables thought to increase, decrease, or cause no change in level of maternal-fetal attachment. Keyword searches included maternal-fetal attachment, parental attachment, and prenatal attachment.

Study selection: Twenty-two studies were selected that met the inclusion criteria of original research, clear delineation of the measurement of maternal-fetal attachment, measurement of maternal-fetal attachment during pregnancy, and inclusion of women or couples, or both.

Data extraction: Studies measuring maternal-fetal attachment included a broad range of variables as potential risk or protective factors, or both. Factors associated with higher levels of maternal-fetal attachment included family support, greater psychological well-being, and having an ultrasound performed. Factors such as depression, substance abuse, and higher anxiety levels were associated with lower levels of maternal-fetal attachment.

Data synthesis: The large majority of studies reviewed were limited by small, homogenous samples deemed insufficient to detect significant differences, inconsistent measurement of maternal-fetal attachment during gestational periods, and cross-sectional designs.

Conclusions: Further research is essential to identify factors influencing maternal-fetal attachment. Specifically, research needs to be conducted on larger sample sizes of greater racial and ethnic diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abrams B, Altman SL, Pickett KE. Pregnancy weight gain: Still controversial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000;71S:1233S–1241S. - PubMed
    1. Ahern NR, Ruland JP. Maternal-fetal attachment in African-American and Hispanic-American women. Journal of Perinatal Education. 2003;12(4):27–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Armstrong DS. Emotional distress and prenatal attachment in pregnancy after perinatal loss. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2002;34:339–345. - PubMed
    1. Austin MP. Perinatal mental health: Opportunities and challenges for psychiatry. Australasian Psychiatry. 2003;11:399–403.
    1. Austin MP. Antenatal screening and early intervention for “perinatal ” distress, depression and anxiety: Where to from here? Archive of Women’s Mental Health. 2004;7:1–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms