Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Mar;12(1):7-19.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-008-0391-0. Epub 2008 May 30.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Affiliations
Review

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

M Pescatori et al. Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Pescatori M, Favetta U, Dedola S, Orsini S (1997) Transanal stapled excision of rectal mucosal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 1:96–98
    1. Longo A (1998) Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosal and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular-suturing device: a new procedure. In: Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery. Monduzzi Editori, Rome, pp 777–784
    1. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE (2000) Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 335:784–785 - PubMed
    1. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM (2000) Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy; randomized controlled trial. Lancet 355:779–781 - PubMed
    1. Thaha MA, Irvine LA, Steele RJ, Campbell KL (2005) Postdefecation pain syndrome after circular stapled anopexy is abolished by oral nifedipine. Br J Surg 92:208–210 - PubMed