Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;121(6):1949-1955.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318170709e.

Donor-site morbidity after autologous costal cartilage harvest in ear reconstruction and approaches to reducing donor-site contour deformity

Affiliations

Donor-site morbidity after autologous costal cartilage harvest in ear reconstruction and approaches to reducing donor-site contour deformity

Rajan S Uppal et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Harvesting of rib as a source of cartilage can result in significant donor-site morbidity. In experienced hands, excellent results from using autologous rib cartilage are achievable for ear reconstruction, rhinoplasty, and otolaryngology. The authors report the morbidity associated with the harvest of costal cartilage in 42 patients who underwent ear reconstruction.

Methods: The notes were examined retrospectively and further data were collected with a questionnaire. Patients noted their experience of pain, clicking, and satisfaction with the donor site. Fifteen patients underwent additional clinical assessments of their donor scar and contour deformity using a standardized scale. Five donor sites were reconstructed with spare cartilage left over from carving the ear framework.

Results: The results showed that pain and clicking of the chest wall represented the commonest complaints. These peaked in the first week after surgery and diminished slowly over 3 months. The donor-site scar and deformity were acceptable to most patients. There was an improvement in the contour deformity of the chest wall harvest site in the five patients who underwent reconstruction of their donor site.

Conclusions: To improve the outcome for patients undergoing cartilage harvest, efforts must be made to further reduce pain and donor-site morbidity. Reconstruction of the donor site with spare cartilage should be attempted where possible to improve the contour defect of the donor site. Refinements in the methods of cartilage harvest or donor-site reconstruction may achieve this in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brent, B. The acquired auricular deformity: A systematic approach to analysis and reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 59: 475, 1977.
    1. Nagata, S. A new method of costal cartilage harvest for total auricular reconstruction: Part I. Avoidance and prevention of intraoperative and postoperative complications and problems. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 117: 2011, 2006.
    1. Sawin, P. D., Traynelis, V. C., and Menezes, A. H. A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions. J. Neurosurg. 88: 255, 1998.
    1. Baryza, M. J. The Vancouver Scar Scale: An administration tool and its interrater reliability. J. Burn Care Rehabil. 16: 535, 1995.
    1. Harris, P. A., Ladhani, K., and Gault, D. T. Reconstruction of acquired sub-total ear defects with autologous costal cartilage. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 52: 268, 1999.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources