In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision
- PMID: 18534400
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.014
In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision
Abstract
Cement-within-cement (C-C) revision arthroplasty minimizes the complications associated with removal of secure polymethylmethacrylate. Failure at the interfacial region between new and old cement mantles remains a theoretical concern. This article assesses the cyclic fatigue properties of bilaminar cement mantles after C-C revision in vitro with the Exeter stem. Seven Exeter stems were cemented into Sawbone femurs and removed, and new undersized stems were cemented into the preserved mantle. The new constructs were loaded for 1,000,000 cycles at body temperature. Cement mantles were inspected postcycling. In no case was there delamination or failure of the cement mantle. The findings support the hypothesis that use of a thin revision cement mantle in conjunction with a polished double-tapered stem is not detrimental to the overall success of the implant. In the presence of a secure cement-bone interface in suitable patients, we recommend C-C revision techniques using double-tapered polished femoral stems.
Similar articles
-
Shear properties of bilaminar polymethylmethacrylate cement mantles in revision hip joint arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2007 Apr;22(3):394-403. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.010. Epub 2007 Jan 22. J Arthroplasty. 2007. PMID: 17400096
-
In vitro analysis of exeter stem torsional stability.J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7):1024-30. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.012. J Arthroplasty. 2007. PMID: 17920476
-
Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=42839. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-16. Orthopedics. 2009. PMID: 19751012 Review.
-
Effect of undersizing on the long-term stability of the Exeter hip stem: A comparative in vitro study.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Nov;25(9):899-908. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.07.003. Epub 2010 Jul 24. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010. PMID: 20659780
-
Cementing constrained acetabular liners in revision hip replacement: clinical and laboratory observations.Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:131-40. Instr Course Lect. 2004. PMID: 15116607 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of a double-layer cementing technique on the homogeneity of cementation and the generation of loose bone cement fragments in tibial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 13;20(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2929-x. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31722711 Free PMC article.
-
Cement-in-cement technique of the femoral component in aseptic total hip arthroplasty revision: A systematic review of the contemporary literature.J Orthop. 2021 Jun 30;26:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.06.002. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug. J Orthop. 2021. PMID: 34276146 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246740. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33571251 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasonic cement removal in cement-in-cement revision total hip arthroplasty: What is the effect on the final cement-in-cement bond?Bone Joint Res. 2019 Jul 5;8(6):246-252. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.86.BJR-2018-0313.R1. eCollection 2019 Jun. Bone Joint Res. 2019. PMID: 31346452 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical