Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2008 Jul;36(7):1380-8.
doi: 10.1177/0363546508317411. Epub 2008 Jun 5.

Varus/valgus and internal/external torsional knee joint stiffness differs between sexes

Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Varus/valgus and internal/external torsional knee joint stiffness differs between sexes

Randy J Schmitz et al. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Torsional joint stiffness is thought to play a role in the observed sex bias in noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury rates.

Hypothesis: Women will exhibit lower torsional stiffness values of the knee in response to varus/valgus and internal/external rotations than will men.

Study design: Controlled laboratory study.

Methods: Knee kinematics of 20 university students (10 men, 27.3 +/- 3.4 years, 177.3 +/- 6.8 cm, 81.1 +/- 7.0 kg; 10 women, 22.9 +/- 1.5 years, 169.0 +/- 7.1 cm, 66.1 +/- 11.4 kg) were measured while 0 to 10 N . m of varus and valgus torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and while 0 to 5 N . m of internal and external torques were applied with the subject nonweightbearing and weightbearing with the use of a custom joint testing device. Joint stiffness values were calculated at 1-N . m increments.

Results: When low magnitudes of torque were applied to the knee, women had significantly lower stiffness values than did men. With the exception of applied external torque with the joint weightbearing and varus torque with the joint nonweightbearing, women demonstrated an increase in joint stiffness as the magnitude of torque increased from lower to higher magnitudes. In contrast, for the men, joint stiffness values remained unchanged as the magnitude of applied torque increased.

Conclusion: Women exhibited lower knee stiffness in response to low magnitudes of applied torque compared to men and demonstrated an increase of joint stiffness as the magnitude of applied torque increased.

Clinical relevance: The decreased stiffness behavior of the knee in response to low torques that was observed for women may have a role in detrimentally affecting knee biomechanics and resulting neuromuscular function, particularly when an individual transitions from nonweightbearing to weightbearing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vermont Knee Laxity Device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A hand-held force transducer applied resistance to the medial and lateral aspect of the distal tibia to create a 10 Nm varus and valgus torque at the knee.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Internal and external rotation torques from 0-5 Nm were applied to the knee using a T-handle connected to a six degree-of-freedom force transducer firmly fixed to the foot cradle.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Valgus torsional stiffnesses of the knee for males and females (mean ± SD). * Males' stiffness value significantly greater than females. † Females' stiffness significantly greater than the lowest stiffness value for females.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Varus torsional stiffnesses of the knee for males and females (mean ± SD). Main effect for male stiffness being greater than female stiffness.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Internal torsional stiffnesses with the joint unweighted of the knee for males and females (mean ± SD). * Stiffness value for one sex significantly greater than other at applied torque increment. † Females' stiffness significantly greater than the lowest stiffness value for females
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
External torsional stiffnesses with the joint unweighted of the knee for males and females (mean ± SD). * Males' stiffness value significantly greater than females. † Females' stiffness significantly greater than the lowest stiffness value for females.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Internal torsional stiffnesses with the knee weightbearing for males and females (mean ± SD). * Males' stiffness values significantly greater than females. † Females' stiffness significantly greater than the lowest stiffness value for females.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
External torsional stiffnesses with the knee weightbearing for males and females. * Males' stiffness value significantly greater than females. † Male knee stiffness greater than the least male stiffness mean.

References

    1. Arampatzis A, Bruggemann GP, Metzler V. The effect of speed on leg stiffness and joint kinetics in human running. J Biomech. 1999;32:1349–1353. - PubMed
    1. Boden BP, Dean GS, Feagin JA, Garrett WE. Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Orthopedics. 2000;23:573–578. - PubMed
    1. Bryant JT, Cooke TD. Standardized biomechanical measurement for varus-valgus stiffness and rotation in normal knees. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:863–870. - PubMed
    1. Butler RJ, Crowell HP, 3, Davis IM. Lower extremity stiffness: implications for performance and injury. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:511–517. - PubMed
    1. Carcia CR, Shultz SJ, Granata KP, Gansneder BM, Perrin DH. Knee ligament behavior following a controlled loading protocol does not differ by menstrual cycle day. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004;19:1048–1054. - PubMed

Publication types