Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jun;10(3):260-6.

Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value

Affiliations
Review

Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value

Kathryn A Phillips et al. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

It is important to understand how knowledge of genomics can be translated from research into clinical practice and health policies. This review examines existing evidence on three key factors in the adoption of personalized medicine: utilization, preferences, and economic value, using two cancer examples: HER2/neu antigen testing and trastuzumab (Herceptin) treatment and genetic testing for Lynch syndrome. Our findings highlight areas in which additional research is required to build an evidence base addressing utilization of, preferences for, and the potential costs and benefits of personalized medicine. Major challenges include a lack of linked data, the need for relevant research frameworks and methodologies, and the clinical complexities of genomic-based diagnostics and treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Framework

References

    1. Department of Health and Human Services and Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics Health and Society. Coverage and Reimbursement of Genetic Tests and Services: Report of the Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, Public Comment Draft. [Accessed: 05/30/07]. 2006. Available at: http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/SACGHS/reports/CR_report.pdf. Comprehensive review of coverage and reimbursement issues conducted by an advisory group in the US.
    1. The Royal Society. Personalized medicines: hopes and realities. The Royal Society Science Section; London: [accessed 5/22/07]. 2005. Available at: http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=15874. Important review conducted by an advisory group in the UK.
    1. Phillips KA, Van Bebber SL. Measuring the value of pharmacogenomics. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2005;4(6):500–09. Develops a resource allocation framework for accessing the potential value of alleles of CYP2D6, an important drug metabolizing enzyme. - PubMed
    1. Ginsburg GS, Angrist M. The future may be closer than you think: a response from the Personalized Medicine Coalition to the Royal Society’s report on personalized medicine. Personalized Medicine. 2006;3(2):119–123. - PubMed
    1. Yaziji H, Goldstein LC, Barry TS, Werling R, Hwang H, Ellis GK, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Gown AM. HER-2 Testing in Breast Cancer Using Parallel Tissue-Based Methods. JAMA. 2004;291(16):1972–1977. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources