Knowledge and beliefs related to cervical cancer and screening among Korean American women
- PMID: 18539883
- PMCID: PMC3090726
- DOI: 10.1177/0193945908319250
Knowledge and beliefs related to cervical cancer and screening among Korean American women
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine knowledge and health beliefs associated with cervical cancer screening among Korean American women. A telephone survey was conducted with 189 Korean American women in the Chicago area. Age, marital status, income, knowledge of early detection method for cervical cancer, and perceived beliefs about benefits of and barriers to receiving Pap tests were all related to outcomes of ever having a Pap test and having had one in the preceding 3 years. Variables uniquely related to ever having a Pap test were education, employment status, fluency in English, and proportion of life spent in the United States. Variables uniquely related to having had the test during the preceding 3 years were having a usual source of care and regular checkups. Different intervention components are suggested for the groups of Korean American women who have never had a Pap smear and for those who have not had one in the preceding 3 years, in addition to common intervention strategies that aim to increase knowledge and perceived benefit and to decrease perceived barriers to receiving Pap tests.
References
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast- and cervical-cancer screening among Korean women—Santa Clara County, California, 1994 and 2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2004;53(33):765–767. - PubMed
-
- Champion VL. Instrument refinement for breast cancer screening behaviors. Nursing Research. 1993;42(3):139–143. - PubMed
-
- Champion VL. Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Research in Nursing & Health. 1999;22(4):341–348. - PubMed
-
- Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI. Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1993;85(7):566–570. - PubMed
