Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S45-9.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.248.

Treatment for persons with substance use disorders: mediators, moderators, and the need for a new research approach

Affiliations

Treatment for persons with substance use disorders: mediators, moderators, and the need for a new research approach

Thomas F Babor. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

This article describes two major studies (i.e. Project MATCH and the US Department of Veterans Affair Effectiveness Study) of mediators and moderators of drinking behavior change following treatment, and considers alternatives to the dominant paradigm that has guided treatment research for more than two decades. Both studies were designed to test the "Technology Model" of therapeutic change, which postulates that patient attributes and treatment process elements, respectively, constitute mediators and moderators of change in drinking and drug use following treatment. The studies show that matching to therapeutic orientation is not an essential ingredient to substantially enhanced outcomes, as previously believed. They also indicate that the mediational mechanisms underlying several of the most popular therapies are different than what is suggested by their proponents. The inability of the Technology Model to explain, much less improve, the effectiveness of addiction treatment suggests the need for a new paradigm. It may be more fruitful to look for matching in larger populations at the level of communities or treatment systems, where a wider range of settings and therapeutic interventions can be evaluated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Babor TF, Del Boca FK (eds). Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
    1. Bühringer G. Allocating treatment options to patient profiles: clinical art or science? Addiction 2006; 101: 646–52. - PubMed
    1. Cooney NL, Babor TF, DiClemente CC, Del Boca FK. Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH In Babor TF, Del Boca FK. (eds) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 222–37.
    1. Donovan DM. Efficacy and effectiveness: complementary findings from two multisite trials evaluating outcomes of alcohol treatments differing in theoretical orientations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999; 23: 564–72. - PubMed
    1. Finney JW. Enhancing substance abuse treatment evaluations: examining mediators and moderators of treatment effects. Special Issue: Substance abuse treatment programs and processes. J Sub Abuse 1995; 7: 135–50. - PubMed

Publication types