Development and validation of a cluster-based classification system to facilitate treatment tailoring
- PMID: 18543365
- PMCID: PMC6879078
- DOI: 10.1002/mpr.251
Development and validation of a cluster-based classification system to facilitate treatment tailoring
Abstract
Aims: The objectives of this study were to replicate smoker profiles identified in Batra et al. (in press) and to develop a cluster-based classification system to categorize new cases into smoker profiles so that an appropriate tailored intervention could be applied.
Methods: Participants were smokers in southwest Germany who sought treatment for smoking cessation. In the first sample, discriminant analysis was used to create classification formulas for a future study (classification sample: n = 165). The second sample served to replicate the smoker profiles, which included participants reporting symptoms of hyperactivity/novelty-seeking, depressivity or high nicotine dependence as well as participants scoring low across smoking and psychological variables (replication sample: N = 134).
Results: Part 1 was focused on the development of formulas, using Fisher's coefficients, with which new cases could be classified. Part 2 adequately replicated previous findings concerning the smoker profiles, such that 70% of participants in the second sample were classified identically using cluster analysis and classification formulas.
Conclusions: The smoker profiles found in a previous study were replicated, and a classification system was developed for a future study which will test the efficacy of tailored treatments for the different smoker profiles.
Aims: The objectives of this study were to replicate smoker profiles identified in Batra et al. (in press) and to develop a cluster‐based classification system to categorize new cases into smoker profiles so that an appropriate tailored intervention could be applied.
Methods: Participants were smokers in southwest Germany who sought treatment for smoking cessation. In the first sample, discriminant analysis was used to create classification formulas for a future study (classification sample: n = 165). The second sample served to replicate the smoker profiles, which included participants reporting symptoms of hyperactivity/novelty‐seeking, depressivity or high nicotine dependence as well as participants scoring low across smoking and psychological variables (replication sample: N = 134).
Results: Part 1 was focused on the development of formulas, using Fisher's coefficients, with which new cases could be classified. Part 2 adequately replicated previous findings concerning the smoker profiles, such that 70% of participants in the second sample were classified identically using cluster analysis and classification formulas.
Conclusions: The smoker profiles found in a previous study were replicated, and a classification system was developed for a future study which will test the efficacy of tailored treatments for the different smoker profiles. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
References
-
- Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991.
-
- Batra A, Buchkremer G. Tabakabhängigkeit. Ein Leitfaden für Therapeuten [Tobacco Dependence: A Manual for Therapists]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2004.
-
- Batra A, Collins SE, Torchalla I, Schöter M, Buchkremer G. Multidimensional smoker profiles and their prediction of smoking following a pharmacobehavioral intervention. J Subst Abuse Treat 2008; (In press) DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2007.08.006 - PubMed
-
- Beck A, Steer R. Beck Depression Inventory – Manual. San Antonio, TX, USA: The Psychological Corporation, 1987.
-
- Carver C, White T. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. J Person Soc Psychol 1994; 67: 319–33.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical