Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Summer;36(2):219-48, 211.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x.

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations

Susan M Wolf  1 , Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson, Judy Illes, Vivek Kapur, Moira A Keane, Barbara A Koenig, Bonnie S Leroy, Elizabeth G McFarland, Jordan Paradise, Lisa S Parker, Sharon F Terry, Brian Van Ness, Benjamin S Wilfond
Affiliations
Review

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations

Susan M Wolf et al. J Law Med Ethics. 2008 Summer.

Abstract

No consensus yet exists on how to handle incidental findings (IFs) in human subjects research. Yet empirical studies document IFs in a wide range of research studies, where IFs are findings beyond the aims of the study that are of potential health or reproductive importance to the individual research participant. This paper reports recommendations of a two-year project group funded by NIH to study how to manage IFs in genetic and genomic research, as well as imaging research. We conclude that researchers have an obligation to address the possibility of discovering IFs in their protocol and communications with the IRB, and in their consent forms and communications with research participants. Researchers should establish a pathway for handling IFs and communicate that to the IRB and research participants. We recommend a pathway and categorize IFs into those that must be disclosed to research participants, those that may be disclosed, and those that should not be disclosed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. See, e.g., Green D.Incidental Findings in Computed Tomography of the Thorax Seminars in Ultrasound, CT & MR 200526, no. 114–19.Green DE, Woodward PJ.The Management of Indeterminate Incidental Findings Detected at Abdominal CT Seminars in Ultrasound, CT & MR 200526, no. 12–13.Cai Q, et al. Incidental Findings of Thickening Luminal Gastrointestinal Organs on Computed Tomography: An Absolute Indication for Endoscopy American Journal of Gastroenterology 200398, no. 81734–1737.Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed Tomographic Virtual Colonoscopy To Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349(23):2191–2200., at 2196National Institutes of Health. Department of Health and Human Services State-of-the-Science Statement on Management of the Clinically Inapparent Adrenal Mass (“Incidentaloma”) 2002, available at <February 46http://consensus.nih.gov/2002/2002AdrenalIncidentalomasos021PDF.pdf> (last visited March 6, 2008)Stedman’s Medical Dictionary 2000, “incidentaloma”Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 27thRoof K, et al. Incidental Findings in a Federally-Sponsored Cancer Screening Program Journal of Community Health 199924, no. 4305–312.Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, McIntosh JH.The Outcomes for Patients with Incidental Lesions: Serendipitous or Iatrogenic? American Journal of Roentgenology 1998171, no. 51193–1196.Chidiac RM, Aron DC.Incidentalomas: A Disease of Modern Technology Endocrinology & Metabolism Clinics of North America 199726, no. 1233–253.Parker LS, Majeske RA.Incidental Findings: Patients’ Knowledge, Rights, and Preferences Journal of Clinical Ethics 19956, no. 2176–179.

    1. See Kohane IS, Masys DR, Altman RB.The Incidentalome: A Threat to Genomic Medicine JAMA 2006296, no. 2212–215.

    1. National Human Research Protections Advisory Committee Working Group on Genetics IRB Guidebook Chapter on Human Genetics Research, Draft 2 2002June 27: at 12, available at <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/nhrpac/documents/nhrpac13.pdf> (last visited March 6, 2008) [hereinafter IRB Guidebook].

    1. Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS.Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants American Journal of Bioethics 20066, no. 68–17., at 8-9Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS.Response to Open Peer Commentaries on ‘Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants’: Defining Clinical Utility and Revisiting the Role of Relationships American Journal of Bioethics 20066, no. 6W10–W12.Compare Parker LS.Rethinking Respect for Persons Enrolled in Research ASBH Exchange 20069, no. 21, 6-7, withShalowitz DI, Miller FG.Disclosing Individual Results of Clinical Research: Implications of Respect for Participants JAMA 2005294, no. 6737–740.

    1. See, e.g., Illes J, et al. Practical Approaches to Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research Neurology 200870, no. 5384–390.Vernooij MW, et al. Incidental Findings in Brain MRI in the General Population N. Engl. J. Med 2007357, no. 181821–1828.Illes J, et al. Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research Science 2006311, no. 5762783–784.Zalis ME, et al. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System: A Consensus Proposal Radiology 2005236, no. 13–9., at 7-8.

Publication types