Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;180(2):486-91; discussion 491.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.04.034. Epub 2008 Jun 11.

Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma

Changhee Yoo et al. J Urol. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Purposes: It is controversial that perinephric fat infiltration has an impact on survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size on patient survival.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 783 and 77 patients with pT1-2 (cN0M0) and pT3a (cN0M0) renal cell carcinoma, respectively. Sporadic unilocular noncystic renal cell carcinoma was included. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors, including perinephric fat infiltration, on cancer specific and disease-free survival were performed. Median followup was 56.0 months after surgery.

Results: Patients with pT1-2 and pT3a tumors had a 5-year cancer specific survival rate of 96.1% and 84.9%, and a 5-year disease-free survival rate of 93.4% and 74.7%, respectively (each p <0.01). Age, tumor size and Fuhrman nuclear grade were independent prognostic factors for cancer specific and disease-free survival, whereas perinephric fat infiltration was significant only for disease-free survival. However, perinephric fat infiltration had a significant effect on cancer specific survival in patients with pT3a tumors more than 7 cm (p = 0.001). In contrast, patients with pT3a tumors 7 cm or less had cancer specific and disease-free survival similar to that of patients with pT2 tumors. Recurrence of pT3a tumors greater than 7 cm was observed in 44% of patients but in only 14.6% of those with pT3a tumors 7 cm or less (p = 0.029). In contrast to the recurrence of tumors 7 cm or less, recurrence of pT3a tumors more than 7 cm usually developed at multiple sites with a large tumor burden and it progressed rapidly. Consequently 85% of patients with recurrence of pT3a tumors larger than 7 cm died of renal cell carcinoma compared with 33% of those with recurrence of pT3a tumors 7 cm or less (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: In pT3a renal cell carcinoma tumor size was the strongest prognostic factor of disease-free and cancer specific survival. Perinephric fat infiltration was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival but not for cancer specific survival due to the less aggressive behavior of small (7 cm or less) pT3a tumors after recurrence. Tumor size and perinephric fat infiltration should be included in T3a renal cell carcinoma staging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms