Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;38(6):922-35.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9385-2. Epub 2008 Jun 13.

Measuring sexual risk for HIV: a Rasch scaling approach

Affiliations

Measuring sexual risk for HIV: a Rasch scaling approach

Michael Fendrich et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

In this study, we developed an HIV transmission risk scale and examined its psychometric properties using data on sexual behavior obtained from a probability sample of adult men who have sex with men living in Chicago. We used Messick's (Am Psychol 50:741-749, 1995) conceptualization of unified validity theory to organize the psychometric properties of data. Evidence related to scale content was investigated via Rasch item fit statistics, point-measure correlations, and expert evaluation. The substantive aspect of validity was addressed by interpreting the meaningfulness of the item difficulty hierarchy (continuum of risky behaviors) and assessment of person fit. The structural aspect of validity was assessed using Rasch item fit statistics, principal component analysis of standardized residuals, and other residual analyses. The generalizability aspect of validity was investigated via internal consistency reliability estimates for both items and persons, and aspects of external validity were addressed by examining between-group differences with respect to levels of risky behavior. Applications and suggested future studies are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Expected score maps for misfitting persons. Note: Items 13 and 14 are the recoded versions of items 13–15 and 16–18, respectively, unprotected anal intercourse in a public place (uaipp) and unprotected anal intercourse in a group situation (uaigs). Otherwise, item numbers and abbreviations correspond to those in the Appendix
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Person/item variable map. Note: Each ‘#’ is 6 persons and each ‘.’ is one person. M, S, and T represent the mean, 1 SD, and 2 SD, respectively. Items 13 and 14 are the recoded versions of items 13–15 and 16–18, respectively, unprotected anal intercourse in a public place (uaipp), and unprotected anal sex in a group situation (uaigs). Otherwise, item numbers and abbreviations correspond to those in the Appendix

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 1999.
    1. Anderson J, Nelson D, Wilson R. Telephone coverage and measurement of health risk indicators: Data from the National Health Interview Survey. American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88:1392–1395. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arreola SG, Neilands TB, Pollack LM, Paul JP, Catania JA. Higher prevalence of childhood sexual abuse among Latino men who have sex with men than non-Latino men who have sex with men: Data from the Urban Men’s Health Survey. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2005;29:285–290. - PubMed
    1. Barrett DC, Pollack LM. Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. Sociological Quarterly. 2005;46:437–456.
    1. Barrett DC, Pollack LM, Tilden ML. Teenage sexual orientation, adult openness, and status attainment in gay males. Sociological Perspectives. 2002;45:163–182.

Publication types