Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct;49(10):4336-9.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1516. Epub 2008 Jun 14.

Evidence of shared genes in refraction and axial length: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study

Affiliations

Evidence of shared genes in refraction and axial length: the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study

Mohamed Dirani et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Axial length has been shown to explain up to 50% of the total variance in refraction, with axial length and refraction having a major genetic component. However, no study has attempted to determine whether the correlation between axial length and refraction is explained by shared genetic or environmental factors.

Methods: All twins from Victoria aged 18 years or older were invited to participate in the Genes in Myopia (GEM) twin study through the Australian Twin Registry (ATR). Each twin completed a general questionnaire and underwent dilated objective refraction assessment and measurement of axial length.

Results: A total of 612 twin pairs (1224 twins) aged from 18 to 86 years were examined in the GEM twin study. Axial length correlated negatively with refraction (r = -0.64 in the men, r = -0.68 in the women; P < 0.01). The sex limitation ADE (A, additive genetic; D, dominant genetic; E, unique environmental factors) model provided the best-fit genetic model for both measures. Of the variation in spherical equivalence in both the men and the women, approximately 50% were due to genetic factors influencing axial length.

Conclusions: From these findings, it is likely that axial length and refraction share common genes in their etiology. The GEM twin study has provided a basis and direction for future research into identifying the gene(s) in axial length that will ultimately improve our understanding of the etiology of refractive error, particularly myopia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Refraction data survey: 2nd generation correlation of myopia.
    Greene PR, Medina A. Greene PR, et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct;36(5):609-14. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0172-0. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Int Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 26757932 Free PMC article.
  • Endophenotyping reveals differential phenotype-genotype correlations between myopia-associated polymorphisms and eye biometric parameters.
    Chen JH, Chen H, Huang S, Lin J, Zheng Y, Xie M, Lin W, Pang CP, Zhang M. Chen JH, et al. Mol Vis. 2012;18:765-78. Epub 2012 Mar 30. Mol Vis. 2012. PMID: 22509107 Free PMC article.
  • A Genome-Wide Association Study for Susceptibility to Axial Length in Highly Myopic Eyes.
    Lu Q, Du Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Li H, He W, Tang Y, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Wu J, Zhu X, Lu Y. Lu Q, et al. Phenomics. 2022 Dec 5;3(3):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s43657-022-00082-x. eCollection 2023 Jun. Phenomics. 2022. PMID: 37325711 Free PMC article.
  • Nine loci for ocular axial length identified through genome-wide association studies, including shared loci with refractive error.
    Cheng CY, Schache M, Ikram MK, Young TL, Guggenheim JA, Vitart V, MacGregor S, Verhoeven VJ, Barathi VA, Liao J, Hysi PG, Bailey-Wilson JE, St Pourcain B, Kemp JP, McMahon G, Timpson NJ, Evans DM, Montgomery GW, Mishra A, Wang YX, Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Polasek O, Wright AF, Amin N, van Leeuwen EM, Wilson JF, Pennell CE, van Duijn CM, de Jong PT, Vingerling JR, Zhou X, Chen P, Li R, Tay WT, Zheng Y, Chew M; Consortium for Refractive Error and Myopia; Burdon KP, Craig JE, Iyengar SK, Igo RP Jr, Lass JH Jr; Fuchs' Genetics Multi-Center Study Group; Chew EY, Haller T, Mihailov E, Metspalu A, Wedenoja J, Simpson CL, Wojciechowski R, Höhn R, Mirshahi A, Zeller T, Pfeiffer N, Lackner KJ; Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2; Bettecken T, Meitinger T, Oexle K, Pirastu M, Portas L, Nag A, Williams KM, Yonova-Doing E, Klein R, Klein BE, Hosseini SM, Paterson AD; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions, and Complications Research Group; Makela KM, Lehtimaki T, Kahonen M, Raitakari O, Yoshimura N, Matsuda F, Chen LJ, Pang CP, Yip SP, Yap MK, Meguro A, Mizuki N, Inoko H, Foster PJ, Zhao JH, Vithana E, Tai ES, Fan Q, Xu L, Campbell H, Fleck B, Rudan … See abstract for full author list ➔ Cheng CY, et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Aug 8;93(2):264-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.06.016. Am J Hum Genet. 2013. PMID: 24144296 Free PMC article.
  • The Role of GJD2(Cx36) in Refractive Error Development.
    van der Sande E, Haarman AEG, Quint WH, Tadema KCD, Meester-Smoor MA, Kamermans M, De Zeeuw CI, Klaver CCW, Winkelman BHJ, Iglesias AI. van der Sande E, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 2;63(3):5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.3.5. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022. PMID: 35262731 Free PMC article. Review.

Publication types