Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations
- PMID: 18553206
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-9965-1
Abdominal wall dimensions and umbilical position vary widely with BMI and should be taken into account when choosing port locations
Abstract
Background: Many surgeons rely on the umbilicus when determining the location of ports for laparoscopic procedures and falsely assume that it is located in the vertical midline. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of variation in umbilical position and abdominal dimensions in the general population.
Methods: Torso length, abdominal girth, weight, and height were recorded for 259 patients over a 9-month period. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and used to classify patients into four groups: underweight, normal, overweight, and obese.
Results: Average umbilical position for all BMI groups was below the true vertical midpoint and dropped further caudally as BMI increased. In addition, average abdominal dimensions increased with increasing BMI. There was no statistical difference between males and females in each BMI group regarding umbilical position or abdominal dimensions.
Conclusion: There is a clear relationship between increasing BMI and a drop in umbilical position as well as an increase in abdominal dimensions. We recommend determining umbilical position and abdominal dimensions prior to placing ports and shifting port positions toward target quadrants.
Similar articles
-
[Significance of umbilical position for the operative approach in minimally invasive hysterectomy].Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012;51(7):12-7. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2012. PMID: 23610911 Bulgarian.
-
The Effect of Age and Body Mass Index on the Surgical Anatomy of Supraumbilical Port Insertion: Implications for Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(6):546-551. doi: 10.1159/000488676. Epub 2018 Apr 27. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018. PMID: 29705775
-
Variance in abdominal wall anatomy and port placement in women undergoing robotic gynecologic surgery.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Sep-Oct;17(5):583-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Jul 2. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20598650
-
Single port laparoscopy.Fertil Steril. 2012 May;97(5):e17. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.049. Fertil Steril. 2012. PMID: 22542145
-
Supraumbilical primary trocar insertion for laparoscopic access: the relationship between points of entry and retroperitoneal vital vasculature by imaging.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;213(4):506.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.060. Epub 2015 May 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 26032039
Cited by
-
Female Abdominal Landmarks and Their Improvements Using Polydioxanone Thread Placement for Umbilicus Elevation.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Nov 17;11(11):e5413. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005413. eCollection 2023 Nov. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023. PMID: 38025605 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomy-based computer-assisted evaluation for aesthetic new navel formation.Surg Radiol Anat. 2025 Jun 1;47(1):154. doi: 10.1007/s00276-025-03646-4. Surg Radiol Anat. 2025. PMID: 40451944
-
Abdominoplasty Combined with Hip Expansion by Fat Grafting: An Evolution in Waistline Contouring.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Aug 9;12(8):e6059. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006059. eCollection 2024 Aug. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024. PMID: 39129844 Free PMC article.
-
Elements of morphology: Standard terminology for the trunk and limbs.Am J Med Genet A. 2022 Nov;188(11):3191-3228. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62965. Epub 2022 Sep 5. Am J Med Genet A. 2022. PMID: 36062894 Free PMC article.
-
Stoma issues in the obese patient.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011 Dec;24(4):259-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295689. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2011. PMID: 23204941 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
