Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing at sites other than earlobe
- PMID: 18556275
- PMCID: PMC2432173
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39580.497176.25
Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing at sites other than earlobe
Abstract
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of body piercing, other than of earlobes, in the general adult population in England, and to describe the distribution of body piercing by age group, sex, social class, anatomical site, and who performed the piercings. To estimate the proportion of piercings that resulted in complications and the proportion of piercings that resulted in professional help being sought after the piercing.
Design: Cross sectional household survey.
Setting: All regions of England 2005.
Participants: 10,503 adults aged 16 and over identified with a two stage selection process: random selection of geographical areas and filling predefined quotas of individuals. Results weighted to reflect the national demographic profile of adults aged 16 and over.
Main outcome measures: Estimates of the prevalence of body piercing overall and by age group, sex, and anatomical site. Estimates, in those aged 16-24, of the proportion of piercings associated with complications and the seeking of professional help.
Results: The prevalence of body piercing was 1049/10,503 (10%, 95% confidence interval 9.4% to 10.6%). Body piercing was more common in women than in men and in younger age groups. Nearly half the women aged 16-24 reported having had a piercing (305/659, 46.2%, 42.0% to 50.5%). Of the 754 piercings in those aged 16-24, complications were reported with 233 (31.0%, 26.8% to 35.5%); professional help was sought with 115 (15.2%, 11.8% to 19.5%); and hospital admission was required with seven (0.9%, 0.3% to 3.2%).
Conclusions: Body piercing is common in adults in England, particularly in young women. Problems are common and the assistance of health services is often required. Though serious complications requiring admission to hospital seem uncommon, the popularity of the practice might place a substantial burden on health services.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: NDN has acted as a paid hygiene consultant to acupuncturists and manufacturers of ear piercing equipment and an unpaid hygiene consultant to tattooists and beauty therapists. He has also acted as an expert witness in judicial cases concerned with the hygiene of skin piercing.
Comment in
-
Double standards in obtaining consent for piercings.BMJ. 2008 Jul 8;337(7661):a593. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a593. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18614490 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Health and regulation issues for body piercing.BMJ. 2008 Jul 8;337(7661):a595. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a595. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18614491 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
An investigation into the practice of tongue piercing in the South West of England.Br Dent J. 2006 Jan 28;200(2):103-7; discussion 93. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813150. Br Dent J. 2006. PMID: 16444231
-
Prevalence of piercing in a German population.Eur J Dermatol. 2008 Jan-Feb;18(1):26-8. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2008.0306. Epub 2007 Dec 18. Eur J Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18086585
-
Awareness of dental complications with oral piercings.Oral Dis. 2024 Oct;30(7):4404-4411. doi: 10.1111/odi.14908. Epub 2024 Feb 29. Oral Dis. 2024. PMID: 38424696
-
Complications of body piercing.Am Fam Physician. 2005 Nov 15;72(10):2029-34. Am Fam Physician. 2005. PMID: 16342832 Review.
-
Body piercing: complications and prevention of health risks.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012 Feb 1;13(1):1-17. doi: 10.2165/11593220-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2012. PMID: 22175301 Review.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of medically performed tongue piercing in people with tetraplegia for use with tongue-operated assistive technology.Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Winter;21(1):61-76. doi: 10.1310/sci2101-61. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25762861 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge of potential risk of blood-borne viral infections and tattooing practice among adults in Mandalay Region, Myanmar.PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0209853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209853. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 30629615 Free PMC article.
-
Complication of nasal piercing by Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis: a case report and a review of literature.Cases J. 2010 Jan 25;3:37. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-3-37. Cases J. 2010. PMID: 20205910 Free PMC article.
-
Need for improved public health protection of young people wanting body piercing: evidence from a look-back exercise at a piercing and tattooing premises with poor hygiene practices, Wales (UK) 2015.Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Jul;146(9):1177-1183. doi: 10.1017/S0950268818001024. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Epidemiol Infect. 2018. PMID: 29708089 Free PMC article.
-
An Outbreak of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection Linked to a "Black Friday" Piercing Event.PLoS Curr. 2017 Oct 16;9:ecurrents.outbreaks.51af24797f6f856a9861b5ddabc7db58. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.51af24797f6f856a9861b5ddabc7db58. PLoS Curr. 2017. PMID: 29188131 Free PMC article.
References
-
- House of Commons official report (Hansard) 1999. May 12:col 284-90.
-
- Gould M. Warning of disease risk on body art. Observer 2003. Sep 14.
-
- Stirn A. Body piercing: medical consequences and psychological motivations. Lancet 2003;361:1205-15. - PubMed
-
- Theodossy T. A complication of tongue piercing. A case report and review of the literature. Br Dent J 2003;194:551-2. - PubMed
-
- Armstrong ML, Roberts AE, Owen DC, Koch JR. Contemporary college students and body piercing. J Adolesc Health 2004;35:58-61. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources