On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal
- PMID: 18559139
- DOI: 10.1348/000711008X322853
On sample size calculation for 2x2 fixed-effect ANOVA when variances are unknown and possibly unequal
Abstract
The factorial 2 x 2 fixed-effect ANOVA is a procedure used frequently in scientific research to test mean differences between-subjects in all of the groups. But if the assumption of homogeneity is violated, the test for the row, column, and the interaction effect might be invalid or less powerful. Therefore, for planning research in the case of unknown and possibly unequal variances, it is worth developing a sample size formula to obtain the desired power. This article suggests a simple formula to determine the sample size for 2 x 2 fixed-effect ANOVA for heterogeneous variances across groups. We use the approximate Welch t test and consider the variance ratio to derive the formula. The sample size determination requires two-step iterations but the approximate sample sizes needed for the main effect and the interaction effect can be determined separately with the specified power. The present study also provides an example and a SAS program to facilitate the calculation process.
Similar articles
-
Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 May;60(Pt 1):137-46. doi: 10.1348/000711006X100491. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007. PMID: 17535584
-
A simple procedure to compute the sample size needed to compare two independent groups when the population variances are unequal.Stat Med. 2001 Apr 15;20(7):1089-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.722. Stat Med. 2001. PMID: 11276038
-
Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009 May;62(Pt 2):283-98. doi: 10.1348/000711007X267289. Epub 2007 Dec 21. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2009. PMID: 18157920
-
Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.Stat Med. 1996 Jan 15;15(1):1-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1<1::AID-SIM134>3.0.CO;2-E. Stat Med. 1996. PMID: 8614740 Review.
-
Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jun 1;59(11):990-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.014. Epub 2005 Dec 20. Biol Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 16368078 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources