Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;17(6):1322-8.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2591.

DNA repair capacity and lung cancer risk in never smokers

Affiliations

DNA repair capacity and lung cancer risk in never smokers

Olga Y Gorlova et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Besides secondhand smoke exposure, few other risk factors for lung cancer in lifetime never smokers have been identified. We present the estimates of lung cancer risk associated with suboptimal DNA repair capacity (DRC) measured by the host-cell reactivation assay in lifetime never smokers using data from 219 cases and 309 matched controls enrolled in a case-control study. Suboptimal DRC level (below the control median) conferred a significantly increased lung cancer risk in never smokers [odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.3-2.9; P = 0.0024]. There was a 3.38-fold risk for individuals with DRC below the first quartile (95% CI, 1.8-6.3) compared with individuals with DRC above the third quartile. Secondhand smoke exposure in individuals with DRC below the control median was associated with a 3.81-fold risk of lung cancer (95% CI, 2.3-6.4). A 2.49-fold (95% CI, 1.1-5.6) risk was noted for the joint effects of lung cancer family history in first-degree relatives and suboptimal DRC. Relatives of probands (cases and controls) with lowest DRC (below the first quartile) were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with lung cancer (odds ratio, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.1-6.7) compared with relatives of probands with the most proficient DRC (above the third quartile). Relatives of probands with suboptimal (below the control median) versus proficient DRC also had an earlier age at diagnosis with lung cancer, although the only statistically significant difference was in female relatives (55.4 versus 67.7 years; P = 0.03).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hackshaw AK, Law MR, Wald NJ. The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ 1997;315:980–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee CH, Ko YC, Goggins W, et al. Lifetime environmental exposure to tobacco smoke and primary lung cancer of non-smoking Taiwanese women. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:224–31. - PubMed
    1. Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, Hanley JA. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a metaanalysis. Lung Cancer 2000;27:3–18. - PubMed
    1. Johnson KC, Hu J, Mao Y. Lifetime residential and workplace exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer in never-smoking women, Canada 1994–97. Int J Cancer 2001;93:902–6. - PubMed
    1. Vineis P, Airoldi L, Veglia P, et al. Environmental tobacco smoke and risk of respiratory cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in former smokers and never smokers in the EPIC prospective study. BMJ 2005;330:277. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances