The development of phase I cancer trial methodologies: the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points sets the scene for phase 0 cancer clinical trials
- PMID: 18559580
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4559
The development of phase I cancer trial methodologies: the use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points sets the scene for phase 0 cancer clinical trials
Abstract
Although the concept of a phase 0 trial is a relatively new one, there has been a slowly increasing trend toward basing early clinical trial designs on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points that has been developing over many years. This article will review the early cancer trial methodologies and the various techniques that have been used to refine them. Several illustrative examples will be presented showing their relevance to trial designs using pharmacodynamic end points and targeted agents. Some criteria for characterizing suitable phase 0 end points are suggested. Four trial designs that are essentially developed for cytotoxic agents using the maximal tolerated dose as an end point are described. Although these trials were not designed with the use of more sophisticated pharmacodynamic end points (such as the measurement of the effect of a targeted agent on its target), they have been developed to optimize the speed with which a dose needed to achieve a particular effect can be determined and are, to this extent, relevant to the design of studies with pharmacodynamic end points.
Similar articles
-
A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.J Immunother. 2007 Jan;30(1):1-15. doi: 10.1097/01.cji.0000211341.88835.ae. J Immunother. 2007. PMID: 17198079 Review.
-
Review of phase II trial designs used in studies of molecular targeted agents: outcomes and predictors of success in phase III.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Mar 10;26(8):1346-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.5913. Epub 2008 Feb 19. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18285606 Review.
-
Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.Stat Med. 2005 Jul 30;24(14):2171-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2102. Stat Med. 2005. PMID: 15909289
-
Novel designs and end points for phase II clinical trials.Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Mar 15;15(6):1866-72. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2035. Epub 2009 Mar 10. Clin Cancer Res. 2009. PMID: 19276272 Review.
-
Phase II clinical trials in oncology: are we hitting the target?Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Mar;10(3):427-38. doi: 10.1586/era.09.178. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010. PMID: 20214523 Review.
Cited by
-
Phase 0 Workshop at the 20th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium, Geneva.Ecancermedicalscience. 2008;2:107. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2008.107. Epub 2008 Nov 12. Ecancermedicalscience. 2008. PMID: 22275983 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Phase 0 clinical trials in oncology new drug development.Perspect Clin Res. 2011 Jan;2(1):13-22. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.76285. Perspect Clin Res. 2011. PMID: 21584177 Free PMC article.
-
The histone methyltransferase SMYD2 methylates PARP1 and promotes poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation activity in cancer cells.Neoplasia. 2014 Mar;16(3):257-64, 264.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Apr 13. Neoplasia. 2014. PMID: 24726141 Free PMC article.
-
Application of hematological toxicity modeling in clinical development of abexinostat (S-78454, PCI-24781), a new histone deacetylase inhibitor.Pharm Res. 2013 Oct;30(10):2640-53. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1089-1. Epub 2013 Jun 5. Pharm Res. 2013. PMID: 23737346
-
Principles of dose finding studies in cancer: a comparison of trial designs.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 May;71(5):1107-14. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-2059-8. Epub 2013 Jan 9. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013. PMID: 23299793 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
