Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov 1;112(9):3582-6.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-151076. Epub 2008 Jun 17.

Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma

Affiliations

Deep vein thrombosis after monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma

Sigurdur Y Kristinsson et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), particularly when treated with immunomodulatory drugs. Recently, 2 small hospital-based studies observed persons with the MM precursor condition, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), to be at increased risk of developing DVT. Among 4 196 197 veterans hospitalized at least once at US Veterans Affairs hospitals, we identified a total of 2374 cases of MGUS, and 39 272 persons were diagnosed with DVT (crude incidence 0.9 per 1000 person-years). A total of 31 and 151 DVTs occurred among MGUS and MM patients, respectively (crude incidence 3.1 and 8.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively; P < .01). Compared with the entire study population, the relative risk (RR) of DVT after a diagnosis of MGUS and MM was 3.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-4.7) and 9.2 (95% CI, 7.9-10.8), respectively. The most prominent excess risk of DVT was found during the first year after diagnosis of MGUS (RR = 8.4; 95% CI, 5.7-12.2) and MM (RR = 11.6; 95% CI, 9.2-14.5). Among 229 MGUS cases (9.5%) that progressed to MM, only one person had a DVT diagnosis before transformation. Our findings suggest the operation of shared underlying mechanisms causing coagulation abnormalities among patients with MGUS and MM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cumulative risk (and 95% confidence interval) for DVT in relation to age among 4 196 197 US veterans.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative risk of DVT among 2374 MGUS cases (solid line), 6192 patients with multiple myeloma (short dashed line), and 4 187 631 persons without a diagnosis of MGUS/multiple myeloma (long dashed line).

Comment in

  • MGUS: not so benign after all.
    Kovacs MJ. Kovacs MJ. Blood. 2008 Nov 1;112(9):3533. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-167700. Blood. 2008. PMID: 18948581 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Heit JA, Silverstein MD, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, Melton L., III Predictors of survival after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based, cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:445–453. - PubMed
    1. Sorensen HT, Mellemkjaer L, Steffensen FH, Olsen JH, Nielsen GL. The risk of a diagnosis of cancer after primary deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1169–1173. - PubMed
    1. Zhan F, Hardin J, Kordsmeier B, et al. Global gene expression profiling of multiple myeloma, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, and normal bone marrow plasma cells. Blood. 2002;99:1745–1757. - PubMed
    1. Browse NL, Thomas ML. Source of non-lethal pulmonary emboli. Lancet. 1974;1:258–259. - PubMed
    1. Bennett CL, Angelotta C, Yarnold PR, et al. Thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thromboembolism among patients with cancer. JAMA. 2006;296:2558–2560. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms