Improving contraceptive use in the United States
- PMID: 18561392
Improving contraceptive use in the United States
Abstract
The average American woman--who wants two children--spends about three decades trying to avoid pregnancy and only a few years trying to become or being pregnant. Sexually active women who are not seeking pregnancy may nonetheless practice contraception poorly or may not use a method at all. A wide range of reasons explain this seeming contradiction, including personal feelings and beliefs; experiences with methods; fears about side effects; partner influences; cultural values and norms; and problems in the contraceptive care system. Helping women prevent unintended pregnancy requires a broad-based approach that addresses many of these issues. To identify possible strategies for improving contraceptive use in the United States, two nationally representative surveys investigated women's contraceptive experiences and clinicians' delivery of relevant care. One survey asked sexually active women aged 18-44 who were not seeking pregnancy about their contraceptive use patterns over a one-year period. We focused on adults because many studies have examined adolescents' behavior, and relatively little is known about the contraceptive difficulties experienced by adult women--who account for more than 90% of unintended pregnancies. The second survey asked public and private contraceptive service providers to describe their service delivery protocols and their perceptions of clients' difficulties with method use. Results of these surveys reveal a complex picture of women's motivation and of client-provider interactions that sometimes hinder effective contraceptive use. They also suggest a number of measures that providers can take to help clients improve their contraceptive practice--many of which would require only simple changes in counseling practices and clinical protocols--and that policymakers, researchers and advocates can take to help in this effort.
Similar articles
-
Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use.Contraception. 2008 Jul;78(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.03.009. Epub 2008 May 29. Contraception. 2008. PMID: 18555817
-
U.S. women's one-year contraceptive use patterns, 2004.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007 Mar;39(1):48-55. doi: 10.1363/3904807. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007. PMID: 17355381
-
The family planning attitudes and experiences of low-income women.Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):246-55, 277. Fam Plann Perspect. 1996. PMID: 8959414
-
Medical barriers to effective contraception.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;34(1):19-29, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.01.003. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 17472862 Review.
-
Contraceptive methods: do Hispanic adolescents and their family planning care providers think about contraceptive methods the same way?Med Anthropol. 1996 May;17(1):65-82. doi: 10.1080/01459740.1996.9966128. Med Anthropol. 1996. PMID: 8757713 Review.
Cited by
-
Contraception technology: past, present and future.Contraception. 2013 Mar;87(3):319-30. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 17. Contraception. 2013. PMID: 22995540 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Satisfaction and compliance in hormonal contraception: the result of a multicentre clinical study on women's experience with the ethinylestradiol/norelgestromin contraceptive patch in Italy.BMC Womens Health. 2009 Jun 30;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-18. BMC Womens Health. 2009. PMID: 19566925 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Health insurance coverage predicts lower childbearing among near-poor adolescents.J Adolesc Health. 2013 Dec;53(6):749-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.024. Epub 2013 Aug 12. J Adolesc Health. 2013. PMID: 23945054 Free PMC article.
-
Magnitude and determinants of adequate antenatal care service utilization among mothers in Southern Ethiopia.PLoS One. 2021 Jul 6;16(7):e0251477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251477. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34228728 Free PMC article.
-
Family Planning Reminder Systems: An Updated Systematic Review.Am J Prev Med. 2018 Nov;55(5):716-724. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.009. Am J Prev Med. 2018. PMID: 30342634 Free PMC article.