Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;80(1):49-61.
doi: 10.1007/s00104-008-1565-z.

[Prevention of transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: standard precautions instead of isolation: a 6-year surveillance in a university hospital]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Prevention of transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection: standard precautions instead of isolation: a 6-year surveillance in a university hospital]

[Article in German]
I Kappstein et al. Chirurg. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Background: This study was carried out to evaluate whether the risk of acquiring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increased compared to reference data when standard precautions are practiced instead of strict or contact isolation.

Methods: From 2000 through 2005, all patients with MRSA at a university hospital were prospectively surveyed. The isolates were investigated using molecular microbiology methods (PFGE, PCR) and compliance with hand hygiene was indirectly monitored using the consumption of disinfection solutions and glove use as surrogate markers.

Results: The MRSA rates of the 797 patients were lower than for the reference data (PEG, KISS), the incidence of MRSA infections was reduced continuously, MRSA transmissions to contact patients could be demonstrated in about 30%, and the consumption of hand disinfection solutions as well as gloves was significantly higher in 2005 compared to 2000.

Conclusions: There is no evidence from our results that practicing standard precautions would increase the risk for the acquisition of MRSA compared to strict or contact isolation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 2004 Sep 4;329(7465):533 - PubMed
    1. J Hosp Infect. 2004 Apr;56(4):321-5 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2005 Jan 22-28;365(9456):295-304 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 15;44(12):1536-42 - PubMed
    1. J Hosp Infect. 2004 Jul;57(3):265-6 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources