Characteristics of users of consumer-run drop-in centers versus clubhouses
- PMID: 18563574
- DOI: 10.1007/s11414-008-9112-8
Characteristics of users of consumer-run drop-in centers versus clubhouses
Abstract
Clubhouses and consumer-run drop-in centers (CRDIs) are two of the most widely implemented models of consumer-centered services for persons with serious mental illness. Differences in structure and goals suggest that they may be useful to different types of consumers. Information on what types of consumers use which programs would be useful in service planning. This study analyzes data from the authors' NIMH-funded research on 31 geographically matched pairs of clubhouses and CRDIs involving more than 1,800 consumers to address the following question: are there significant differences in the characteristics and outcomes of members of clubhouses versus CRDIs? Results from multilevel analyses indicated that clubhouse members were more likely to be female, to receive SSI/SSDI, to report having a diagnosis of schizophrenia, and to live in dependent care; and they reported both a greater number of lifetime hospitalizations and current receipt of higher intensity traditional MH services. Controlling for differences in demographic characteristics, psychiatric history, and mental health service receipt, clubhouse members also reported higher quality of life and were more likely to report being in recovery. CRDI consumers were more likely to have substance abuse histories. Possible reasons for the differences are discussed. The results suggest that CRDIs are a viable alternative to more traditional mental health services for individuals who might not otherwise receive mental health services.
Similar articles
-
Consumer-run service participation, recovery of social functioning, and the mediating role of psychological factors.Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Apr;52(4):493-500. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.493. Psychiatr Serv. 2001. PMID: 11274496
-
A conceptual model of how mental health clubhouses impact health and quality of life among individuals with serious mental illness.Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2024 Sep;47(3):249-259. doi: 10.1037/prj0000579. Epub 2024 Feb 15. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2024. PMID: 38358692
-
Family perspectives of how their relatives with mental illness benefit from Clubhouse participation: a qualitative inquiry.J Ment Health. 2016 Aug;25(4):372-378. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1149805. Epub 2016 Mar 4. J Ment Health. 2016. PMID: 26942501
-
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11532238 Review.
-
Organizational characteristics of Brain Injury Clubhouse Model programs.Brain Inj. 2022 Jan 28;36(2):221-231. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2033835. Epub 2022 Feb 11. Brain Inj. 2022. PMID: 35148240 Review.
Cited by
-
Peer support within Clubhouse: a grounded theory study.Community Ment Health J. 2012 Apr;48(2):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9358-5. Epub 2010 Oct 24. Community Ment Health J. 2012. PMID: 20972830
-
A Contemporary Review of the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation: Past, Present, and Emerging Directions.Psychiatr Q. 2023 Dec;94(4):569-604. doi: 10.1007/s11126-023-10051-w. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Psychiatr Q. 2023. PMID: 37796378 Review.
-
A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):28-47. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018. PMID: 27580614 Free PMC article.
-
Clubhouse Model of Psychiatric Rehabilitation in China to Promote Recovery of People With Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 13;12:730552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.730552. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34589010 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical