Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 30;27(24):4895-913.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3329.

Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation

Affiliations

Dose--schedule finding in phase I/II clinical trials using a Bayesian isotonic transformation

Yisheng Li et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

A dose-schedule-finding trial is a new type of oncology trial in which investigators aim to find a combination of dose and treatment schedule that has a large probability of efficacy yet a relatively small probability of toxicity. We demonstrate that a major difference between traditional dose-finding and dose-schedule-finding trials is that while the toxicity probabilities follow a simple nondecreasing order in dose-finding trials, those of dose-schedule-finding trials may adhere to a matrix order. We show that the success of a dose-schedule-finding method requires careful statistical modeling and a sensible dose-schedule allocation scheme. We propose a Bayesian hierarchical model that jointly models the unordered probabilities of toxicity and efficacy and apply a Bayesian isotonic transformation to the posterior samples of the toxicity probabilities, so that the transformed posterior samples adhere to the matrix-order constraints. On the basis of the joint posterior distribution of the order-constrained toxicity probabilities and the unordered efficacy probabilities, we develop a dose-schedule-finding algorithm that sequentially allocates patients to the best dose-schedule combination under certain criteria. We illustrate our methodology through its application to a clinical trial in leukemia and compare it with two alternative approaches.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scenarios in the simulation study for the leukemia trial: —— schedule 1; . . . . . . schedule 2. There are five doses (horizontal axis) in each schedule. The vertical axis is the joint probability of efficacy without toxicity. Points marked by black triangles correspond to the target dose-schedule combinations, at which the probability of toxicity does not exceed 0.3 and the probability of efficacy is at least 0.3.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary operating characteristics based on the simulations: —— two-dimensional BIT design . . . . . . one-dimensional BIT design – – – CRM+AR design. The top two plots are the selection percentages of the target dose-schedule combinations and the numbers of patients treated (averaged across 1000 simulated trials) at these combinations. The bottom two plots are the overall observed toxicity and response rates, calculated by dividing the total numbers of patients who experienced toxicity and efficacy, respectively, by the total numbers of patients treated in the 1000 simulated trials.

References

    1. Thall PF, Russell KE. A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials. Biometrics. 1998;54:251–264. - PubMed
    1. Ivanova A. A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes. Biometrics. 2003;59:1001–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00115.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thall PF, Cook J. Dose-finding based on toxicity-efficacy trade-offs. Biometrics. 2004;60:684–693. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00218.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bekele BN, Shen Y. A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial. Biometrics. 2005;61:343–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00314.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yin G, Li Y, Ji Y. Bayesian dose-finding in phase I/II clinical trials using toxicity and efficacy odds ratios. Biometrics. 2006;62:777–787. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00534.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources